biden white house. is that correct? can you a world where you re trying to be corrupt and then you bill your time to the corruption? i mean, what planet are we living in?e honestly, the stupidity is amazing. if it proves to be tru e, pop i really you got to get popcorn at this point. but it s nott this a joke, sean. these are real people. the trump organization peo paid over $300 million in taxes overw the past few years y to employees. this is about people that work this is abt work. this is about the kids who won t be able to get a mortgage and won t be able to take out a car loan becausee miss james and people like her hale like d a political age it s not a question of fact. it is a fact. therof a fae is video footage of it. ot and like i said today in court ,not one piece.re after three years of investigation, noe years t os after 11 weeks shows that any of them committed frau td. raud. all that it shows is one thing. desperation and interference. it is it is obvious.hetic.
related to, the martin act, which has been around for a hundred years. this is not new law. the notion that you have to have a victim, no, donald trump is making things up as you go along. at the end of the day, the victim is the people. the plaintiff in any case like this is the people of the state of new york, and about protecting the marketplace, and saying you can t just lie and make things up in business this this state. the trump university case ended up with the end of trump university as you well know. could this case end up with the end of the trump organization here in new york state? as we know it, yes. absolutely. what does that mean? executive 6312 contains a provision we have been talking about that allows for the cancellation of corporate charters when there s been consistent and repeated frau. that looks like the case here. certainly something the ag is pursuing and something judge engoron ruled on, we re going to cancel the corporate charters for the businesses
syndrome! notwithstanding that rudy giuliani is co-conspirator number one and could potentially be charged in this case. he says he hasn t gotten a target letter yet. they re pointing back to free speech. of course, when you look at this indictment, what he is being indicted for is not for what he said. it s for this scheme, and how he used the levers of the government and the office of the president of the united states to try to overturn the election results, to try to subvert americans votes. that is what is at the heart of the indictment. jack smith clearly knew they were going to make this argument because he addresses it in the indictment. andrew mccabe, you re the former deputy director of the fbi. the 45-page indictmes really important reading. i recommend everyboda copy and read it. the indictment says this, and i m quoting, the defendant had a right to publicly about the electi even to claim falsely that there had been outcome determinative frau
it was ant michael pence not following through be frau and being told to trump byman naenlt sgenlt and the state legislatures do not have a supreme and total authority, and it is a reminder of the how the ek chs an ball lans work. and yes, as we haefr from the and the gerrymanders is okay from the federal sfwraurnlgt and how it is relating to the ledge slay chufr, and that it is not
speaking like a mob boss, right? he wants to show that there is a price to pay, and i ve written about this so many times over the last eigh years. the three things that motivate trump the most, revenge, revenge, and revenge he is addictive, and so i thin that is what driving this. and some lawyers making someon exploiting that. jill, let me give it to another case that trump has on his hands. he spent about eight hours a new york attorney genera letitia james office for a deposition and her 250 million dollar lawsuit alleging frau in his real estate busines practices. what do you make of trum apparently being so talkativ during the deposition because can t imagine he said he plead the fifth for eight hour straits? i think maybe it s finall something that when you plea the fifth in a civil case, i can be used, it can t be use against him. it cannot and a criminal case. but in a civil case, the jur can be instructed that you can