command to buy insurance, one that can t be enforced at all. and they say that command is unconstitutional. and because that command, which is backed up by no penalties at all is unconstitutional, the entire act has to fall. what is the position of the state of massachusetts, attorney general, on this? well, chris, it s great to be with you, though i m really sad to be here, because frankly, this issue should have been and was settled long ago. the supreme court already upheld the constitutionality of the affordable care act, and then congress went on to try to repeal it no less than 70 times. it s really sad that we are back in court today, and especially so because the u.s. department of justice isn t doing its job. the justice department has a constitutional duty, obligation
on this investigation by the inspector general, but also banking on yet another investigation that bill barr, who is a little bit more politically minded here, is also trying to mount in the same way, all to prove that somehow this russian investigation was cooked up from the beginning and distracting us from the key issue, russia attacked the u.s. election, and donald trump and his campaign helped it along, encouraged it and benefitted from it. all right, david corn, thank you very much. thank you, chris. coming up, the trump administration s latest attempt to destroy the aca at the expense of health care for millions of americans. what happened inside the courtroom today is next. y is ne. think all premium fuels are the same? new shell v-power nitro+ premium gasoline is engineered with four levels of defense against gunk, wear, corrosion and friction. that helps keep your engine running like new. so, maybe it s time to unthink what you think you think about premium fuel.
Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - MSNBC - 20190710:07:55:15 comparemela.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from comparemela.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
trump, he is also a contributor. good to see you both. let s start with the seth rich issue. and the timeline here. say what you will about julian assange, but nobody has proven him wrong. he s been defiant. he defended the sky. and then you look at the timeline you look at earlier reports. is it possible that this whole russian narrative really came from a dnc staffer and that the media has been wrong for almost a year? the media has not been right yet, so the presumption should be that the media is wrong with where they are laying the blame on the leaks that are going on now. i think the fact is that when you look at evidence and this is the timeline, as you mentioned, that is troubling to say the least and i think it raises a
good to see you both. let s start with the seth rich issue. and the timeline here. say what you will about julian assange, but nobody has proven him wrong. he s been defiant. he defended this guy. and then you look at the timeline you look at earlier reports. is it possible that this whole russian narrative really came from a dnc staffer and that the media has been wrong for almost a year? the media has not been right yet, so the presumption should be that the media is wrong with where they are laying the blame on the leaks that are going on now. s i think the fact is that when you look at evidence and this is the timeline, as you mentioned, that is troubling to say the least and i think it raises a serious issue, and a serious