Page 27 - Servotronics Inc News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Stay updated with breaking news from Servotronics inc. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.

Top News In Servotronics Inc Today - Breaking & Trending Today

International Arbitration Update: Supreme Court Asked to Resolve Circuit Split Over Discovery in Aid of Private Commercial Arbitration Seated Outside the United States

International Arbitration Update: Supreme Court Asked to Resolve Circuit Split Over Discovery in Aid of Private Commercial Arbitration Seated Outside the United States
USA
December 16 2020
On December 7, 2020, Servotronics, Inc. filed a petition for writ of certiorari asking the United States Supreme Court to decide whether parties may seek discovery in the United States for use in commercial arbitration proceedings seated outside the United States under 28 U.S.C. § 1782 (“Section 1782”), a vigorously debated question that has increasingly divided lower courts.
Under Section 1782, a petitioner may obtain evidence through U.S. federal district courts for use in a proceeding before a “foreign or international tribunal.” Importantly, Section 1782 does not define what qualifies as a “foreign or international tribunal.” Federal courts are increasingly divided on whether the definition includes private commercial arbitral tribunals. ....

United States , United Kingdom , South Carolina , Us Court , Servotronics Inc , Supreme Court , United States Supreme Court , Us Supreme Court , Intel Corp , Devices Inc , Seventh Circuit , Fourth Circuit , Fifth Circuits , Sixth Circuits , Ninth Circuit Courts , Micro Devices , Sixth Circuit , ஒன்றுபட்டது மாநிலங்களில் , ஒன்றுபட்டது கிஂக்டம் , தெற்கு கரோலினா , எங்களுக்கு நீதிமன்றம் , உச்ச நீதிமன்றம் , ஒன்றுபட்டது மாநிலங்களில் உச்ச நீதிமன்றம் , எங்களுக்கு உச்ச நீதிமன்றம் , இன்டெல் கார்ப் , சாதனங்கள் இன்க் ,

International Arbitration Update: Supreme Court Asked To Resolve Circuit Split Over Discovery In Aid Of Private Commercial Arbitration Seated Outside The United States | Morrison & Foerster LLP

To embed, copy and paste the code into your website or blog:
On December 7, 2020, Servotronics, Inc. filed a petition for writ of certiorari asking the United States Supreme Court to decide whether parties may seek discovery in the United States for use in commercial arbitration proceedings seated outside the United States under 28 U.S.C. § 1782 (“Section 1782”), a vigorously debated question that has increasingly divided lower courts.
Under Section 1782, a petitioner may obtain evidence through U.S. federal district courts for use in a proceeding before a “foreign or international tribunal.” Importantly, Section 1782 does not define what qualifies as a “foreign or international tribunal.” Federal courts are increasingly divided on whether the definition includes private commercial arbitral tribunals. ....

United States , United Kingdom , South Carolina , Republic Of Kazakhstan , Abdul Latif Jameel , Ketzel Gmb , Hans Smit , Gasspeicher Gmb , Holding Co , Us Court , Servotronics Inc , Fedex Corp , International Tribunals , Intel Corp , Devices Inc , Deutsche Bank Securities Inc , Ripe For The Supreme Court , Bear Stearns Co Inc , Morrison Foerster , Morrison Foerster Llp , Supreme Court , Abdul Latif Jameel Transportation Co , States Supreme Court , Co Inc , Seventh Circuit , Fourth Circuit ,

Conflicting Decisions Under 28 U.S.C. § 1782: How Should International Commercial Arbitration Deal With the Shifting Landscape? | Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

Introduction
On December 7, 2020, parties and practitioners in international commercial arbitration came one step closer to resolving the threshold question of the applicability of 28 U.S.C. § 1782 to international commercial tribunals. Section 1782 is a distinctive procedural device which potentially allows an applicant who is a party to an international commercial arbitration to petition a U.S. federal district court with competent jurisdiction to order the disclosure of documentary or deposition evidence for use in the foreign arbitration proceeding. Parties to international commercial arbitrations seeking to rely upon 28 U.S.C. § 1782 to obtain documents or evidence in the possession, custody or control of a U.S. entity face a tumultuous landscape. The deepening circuit split on the question of whether international commercial arbitral tribunals are “foreign or international tribunals” for the purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1782(a) makes the issue ripe for U.S. Supreme Co ....

United States , United Kingdom , City Of , Republic Of Kazakhstan , Comision Ejectuvia Hidroelectica , Abdul Latif Jameel , Bear Stearns , Transocean Offshore United States Inc , Holding Co , Biedermann International , Akin Gump Strauss Hauer Feld , Servotronics Inc , Intel Court , Re Axion Holding Cyprus Ltd , European Union , Rolls Royce , Intel Corp , Commission Of The European Communities , Devices Inc , Natl Broadcasting Co , Fourth Circuit In Servotronics Inc , London Court , El Paso Corp , European Commission , District Court , Supreme Court ,

Supreme Court Asked to Decide Circuit Split on Allowing US Discovery in Private, International Arbitrations | Troutman Pepper

To embed, copy and paste the code into your website or blog:
On December 7, the Supreme Court received a request to decide whether parties in private, commercial, international arbitrations can avail themselves of 28 U.S.C. § 1782(a) (Section 1782) to obtain discovery through U.S. federal courts. [1][2] Section 1782 provides in pertinent part:
“The district court of the district in which a person resides or is found may order him to give his testimony or statement or to produce a document or other thing for use in a proceeding in a
foreign or international tribunal…”
Circuits split as to the definition of a “foreign or international tribunal.” The Fourth and Sixth Circuits read the definition broadly finding Section 1782 does authorize U.S. discovery for private international arbitrations. [3] However, the Second, Fifth, and Seventh Circuits narrowly interpret the definition, holding the opposite. [4][5] For additional information regarding the circui ....

United States , City Of , United Kingdom , Republic Of Kazakhstan , Hanwei Guo , Soler Chrysler Plymouth , Abdul Latif Jameel , Bear Stearns , Commission On International Rules Of Judicial Procedure , Holding Co , Mitsubishi Motors Corp , Servotronics Inc , Fedex Corp , Supreme Court , Bear Stearns Co , Envt Defense Fund , See Servotronics Inc , Intel Corp , Devices Inc , Sixth Circuits , Seventh Circuits , Seventh Circuit , Fifth Circuits , International Rules , Judicial Procedure , Rules Commission ,