Thing. The individual mandate would be a great tax cut for the middle class, for Small Businesses and people who have been really hurt lately have been millennials. Theyre young adults, overpaying for health care and on the hook for pensions and the u. S. Debt and state municipal debt. Lets give them a break. David and bruce, according to cbo its going to be good for the debt itself. They say dumping the mandate will save the country 338 billion over ten years. Thats a lot of money. Well, i have no doubt that the idea is to get fewer people covered so they can free up money to give tax cuts for the rich, but i think no, no, no, hold on, hold on. In careness to the cbo. Let me explain how they got the number. The fact is if people are not forced to buy obamacare, fewer people are going to be signing up for subsidies and medicaid. Thats how the cbo came to that number. Go ahead. Okay. So, i would say, you have to have some way, whether its a penalty or in the failed republican repeal and
Thing. The individual mandate would be a great tax cut for the middle class, for Small Businesses and people who have been really hurt lately have been millennials. Theyre young adults, overpaying for health care and on the hook for pensions and the u. S. Debt and state municipal debt. Lets give them a break. David and bruce, according to cbo its going to be good for the debt itself. They say dumping the mandate will save the country 338 billion over ten years. Thats a lot of money. Well, i have no doubt that the idea is to get fewer people covered so they can free up money to give tax cuts for the rich, but i think no, no, no, hold on, hold on. In careness to the cbo. Let me explain how they got the number. The fact is if people are not forced to buy obamacare, fewer people are going to be signing up for subsidies and medicaid. Thats how the cbo came to that number. Go ahead. Okay. So, i would say, you have to have some way, whether its a penalty or in the failed republican repeal and
In the u. S. They were expecting 300,000. So 370 was 20 more. But last year in the same quarter they added 900,000 or 800,000. So wall street journal is making certain points. And then to almost double the bottom line when youre at hundred times earnings thats good but is it still pennies. What was the actual number . Pennies per share. Still pennies per share. Im sort of surprised the international, do they have the content around the world that people will pay for. They havent spent a huge amount of money yet on True International programming in the new languages and what it means is actually that american programming or u. S. Programming with ghienglish is working. They have a benny hill type show ready to go or monti python. Do they know the cultural . What youre finding is narco is working in a lot of places. Its working here and in south america and parts of europe. Its working. What does a billion dollars more spent on content mean in the number of shows and how many, how much n
In elections. More republicans no republican has won the presidency without it. Audio]hy it shows Richard Nixon over kennedy in 1960. Its regional diversity. Its easy to see how they balance each other. [indiscernible] we see regional tendencies. There are more clear when you look at the percentages by region. Will ohio be a bellwether in 2016 . College educated wives historically vote republican but more are leading towards Hillary Clinton this year. Heres why. [indiscernible] [scratchy audio] kasich republicans, their wealthy, welleducated and wary of trump. They could swing their support to clinton. To thechoice has swung winner. That web video is Available Online at citizen an at cincinnati. Org. Joining me is jessie balmert. Thank you for being with us. Theme begin with political geography, the five including cleveland, columbus and cincinnati. How does a breakdown in terms of expected turnout for the democrats and republicans on election day . Jessie im actually in rleveland for
To better help overhaul the federal acquisition process and recognizing that this might take more than a year or two, would you submit to remaining on the those committees long enough to see the job through to completion . Ive served, acquisition reform is largely in the government reform committee. I served as chief counsel in the 90s after i work for congresswoman wilkes even though im not on that committee, we have on all these issues, you do not need to be on a particular committee to work for your constituents so ive had roundtables where ive brought leadership to various committees to talk about acquisition reform and we need working, not at the seat of government but the seed of technology and we have the experts here in our region to help us do that. We are sitting down with john woods several years ago and going through on insider, how we need to work through this more quickly. We also need to create that ecosystem where we have a big company and we need to have our startups a