Seema Kukreja News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana
Stay updated with breaking news from Seema kukreja. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Top News In Seema Kukreja Today - Breaking & Trending Today
Gannon Dunkerley And Company Limited vs Union Of India Ministry Of Road ... on 3 April, 2024 indiankanoon.org - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from indiankanoon.org Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
IMPORTANT JUDGMENTS THIS WEEK1. Petition Styled As One Under Article 226 Would Not Bar High Court To Exercise Its Jurisdiction Which Otherwise It Possesses: Supreme CourtCase: Kiran Devi Vs. Bihar. ....
Share This - x The Supreme Court observed that the question of novation of contract containing an arbitration clause cannot be considered by the Court in a petition filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. Detailed arguments on whether an agreement which contains an arbitration clause has or has not been novated cannot possibly be decided in exercise of a limited prima facie review as to whether an arbitration agreement exists between the parties, the bench comprising Justices RF Nariman, BR Gavai and Hrishikesh Roy said. The Court was considering an appeal against dismissal of a petition under Section 11 of the Act filed before the High Court of Delhi. The High Court was of the view that the memorandum of understanding [which contained the arbitration clause] ceased to exist on and from the date of the Shareholders Agreement which superseded the aforesaid MoU and novated the same. ....
Introduction: Sanjiv Prakash v. Seema Kukreja & Ors. 1, the Delhi High Court has reiterated that novation of an agreement would necessarily result in destruction of the arbitration clause contained therein. In this regard, it was observed that an arbitration agreement being a creation of an agreement may be destroyed by agreement. Facts of the case: Respondent No. 3 had incorporated a company in 1971, under the name of Asian Films Laboratories Private Limited, which was subsequently renamed as ANI Media Private Limited in 1997 ( Company ). The shareholders of the said Company were Respondent No. 3 s son ( Petitioner ) and his daughter and wife ( Respondent No. 1 and ....