Live Breaking News & Updates on Second Panel Discussion
Stay updated with breaking news from Second panel discussion. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Evaluating all of that information would be to issue an initial determination, initial decision of a defect to takata and the automakers. After that, we would hold a public hearing. How soon can you initiate that . As soon as humanly possible. The key, because we want to protect the American Public, we need to make sure we build the strongest case possible because at the end of the day, if takata and the automakers continue to refuse to act, we are going to have to take them to court. We want to make sure that we have a case prepared that will win in that circumstance. You can build a court case over time. Can you estimate for the committee and through the committee to the American People when your next step will be taken . We have begun our next step of diving into the data. That doesnt answer my question. The next legal step. Not just diving into the data. When will you n ....
He doesnt get to do that. Okay. Now his own dhs secretary, jay johns Johns Johnson stated it to enforce a duly enacted constitutional law thats beyond simple prosecutorial discretion. I think that the a least three of our witnesses believe the president has crossed that line. Could you be more specific and let me start with mr. Dupree. Thank you. I think secretary johnson is correct when he says there is a line. I think in this case the president not only crossed the line but that line is far, far, far in the distance. Thats kind of like the line he drew on syria. Right . I think that is an apt analogy. Thank you. I dont know that the constitution requires a certain number of people beyond which he could not grant deferred action to. I dont think the constitution speaks to that degree my time is limited. Im just going to quote very quickly from the opinion quoted by members of this committee and some of the witnesses and that is th ....
Blog a lot. We have demographic information about our readers as most websites do. We have a relationship with them exclusive write content for their users, their subscribers. But the principal focus is heyve made a judgment that advertising Bloomberg Law on scotus law has economic value. Social ey think its a good. You cant lose sight of the fact that bloomberg made a decision for this was something good the country. They may be right, they may be wrong. Calculus. Part of the theyre unbelievably good to us. This is another unusual thing about a sponsor. They give us money and they ask nothing of us. Thats a remarkable relationship to have. Sponsored by ings Bloomberg Law. Try and highlight what it occasionally. They have decided to finance this operation. Numbers is not something i want to discuss contractual e relationship. But yes, it does finance the existence. They dont pu ....
Encouraged you i o come visit the unbelievable facility here. Extraordinary. Portal. Log is a well talk about the past. It has the legacy of having the title. Og in the its streaming one entry after another. To be a oal is comprehensive source of information about one nstitution and that is we want to have everything thats going n about every case that the justices are considering. That sounds more sweeping than s is, because the justice decide 80 cases a term. Its a manageable set. Talk to every conceivable audience. We started out talking about lawyers and other people in the group, for example. To be fortunate to be bert known, the health care decision, amesex marriage, the Voting Rights act, the general public has gotten to know us better. Talk about t we can like amys plain english. The attempt to push out information to people who are middle schoolers, high students, allllege the way through to people who have law degrees and ....
Tom had a whole lot of credibility even before the blog started as a Supreme Court advocate. I first started writing about tom when he was a clerk, when he was interning for nina tote 10 berg at n 3 r. As on npr. As an up start, somebody who did not fit the mold as pete said and who was cold calling, the losers of cases in lower courts to see if they wanted to appeal to the Supreme Court, was a model that really hadnt been used before. I remember interviewing another top advocate of the, before the Supreme Court and asked him about tommy and he said, well, you know you wouldnt want your heart surgery done by the, by the heart surgeon who called you up and asked if he could do it. Who was that . That was a fellow by the name of john roberts who became a chief justice. I think he is sort of eating his words on that. So i thin ....