Consistent on, it is dehumanizing immigrants. His rhetoric is getting worse, teetering on the brink of dangerous. Plus the growing movement in washington on the israel policy. And after helping to take away their right to choose, some texas judges may learn the hard way you shouldnt mess with texas women. Lets do it. Im ayman. In 2015, then candidate donald trump launched his bid for presidency at trump tower by speaking in dehumanizing terms about mexican immigrants. Nine years later, we saw trump this week campaigning for a second term in grand rapids michigan, flanked by Law Enforcement officers, he repeated his baseless claim that countries are sending quote prisoners, murders, drug dealers, mental patients and terrorists into the u. S. He said of migrants accused of crime, they are not humans, they are animals. In front of a crowd of cheering supporters, he painted a dystopian story of immigrants quote crawling through your windows and ransacking your drawers where they loot the j
Promise to unleash fire and fury at north korea, you could be forgiven for your confusion about whether youre listening to the fictional hungarian on game of thrones or the very real president of the United States. Trump spent this week ratcheting up the rhetoric even as his own cabinet tried to take it down. The war talk between rounds of golf at bedminster has made it difficult to tell trumps words from those of the brutal 33yearold dictator of north korea. Take, for instance, some of the tough talk from this week about a sea of fire or the threat that only absolute force can work on him. Can you guess who said it . Mother of dragons, kim jongun, donald trump. Okay, all of those came from kims regime. But you werent 100 certain, were you . Because with trump its very hard to tell the difference. Now i should note that the threats and weapons tests and bluster from north korea are actually nothing new. But as the New York Times noted this week with previous american president s they w
the ban also prevents it the to top it all off there s the ousting of sebastian gorca, a deputy advisor to the president who had ties to far right political groups and called islam an inherently violent religion. he says the exit is not a resignation, per se. however, yahoo is reporting white house chief of staff john kelly allegedly revoked his security clearance almost forcing gorca to resign and even doing so while he was on vacation. gorca was set to be back in the white house on monday. nbc news has learned robert mueller has issued grand jury subpoenas to public relations executives who worked with former trump campaign chairman paul manafort. 16 firms received supds. mueller s team is focussing on an international lobbying campaign which ran between 2012 and 2014. the subpoena is the first publication that the investigation into russian interference in the presidential election is beginning to compel witnesses to testify before a grand jury.
joining us live from the white house deputy assistant sebastian gorca. greetings. china getting china and russia to gri agree to the sancs was a success. this is now the fifth or sixth or seventh round kpening on how you count them and generally none of them served to stop north korea. kim jong-un boosting about being able to hit u.s. cities and long been able to strike seoul and troops in south korea with traditional weapons. what makes you think this is going to do it? have you thought out the dangers of a military escalation with north korea? we, we have, why is this got a chance? because this is the toughest sanctions package against north korea in u.n. history. the fact that through the good offices of secretary tillerson and ambassador haley and the president, we not only have the ten temporary rotating members
states is morally equivalent to russia? and are they retooling their strategy in the white house as reports suggest? we ve got lots of questions and we have a man who can answer them all. deputy assistant to president trump, author of defeating jihad, the winnable war s sebastian gorca. good to have you. thanks for having me. what s your take on what happens in the courts? i think it s very clear if you look at the statements that came out of the federal court in boston about how this is a completely legal measure. if you look at the original act from the 1950s and the more recent one that gave the president the exclusive right to determine if there are national security concerns with immigrants coming into this country, it s a slam dunk. he s completely within his mandate. there is a problem with these seven nations. i expect the courts to decide in favor of the white house.