results for so much more money? that s a question and it s a structural question. and, i mean, i think it s inaccurate to say that people who critique this don t care about poor kids. actually, they are focused on it like laser beam. they have different ideas than teachers unions do about how to deliver those results. danielle, i ll give you the last word on this. it is a structural problem, but the gentleman has the nature of that structural problem entirely wrong. for the past ten years, the philadelphia school district, one of, you know, the poorest, segregated district has been a laboratory for all of these sorts of free market reforms. every student that attends a charter school, which a third of the district, costs the district $7,000. even the, you know, the state-controlled school reform commissions own superintendent acknowledges that charters are bleeding the school district dry, even though they have completely mixed performance results and are rife with corruption. i mea