we service locally. while charlie says that sourcing locally works for his compan company. we brought in large lots from overseas. so it is a drawback, you know. that we can only do so much. stitch s own production manager, who previously worked with major brands, has even said that manufacturing stateside can be even trickier than manufacturing overseas. sometimes she says that was easier, you know, it was easier to do that, to coordinate 100 factories, and to coordinate suppliers all over the world. but scharly knows that his local suppliers and contractors helped keep him and his bottom line in check. control your distribution. you control your growth. by sourcing the product regionally, now we re able to control the volume that we need to do the inventory so we don t tie up our resources. charlie says his products are made in the usa, and that s the
his popularity after his election. we knew it was going to be a mess. sure enough it s a mess. how we will ever get out of this mess is a very good question, how we will make it operate is a very good question. how it will be fair and equitable is a fair question. why didn t they do the nixon thing of giving it a check for people who couldn t afford to buy health insurance? i have no idea. charles, now whether you like it or not, it is what it is and republicans, of course, want to just turn away from itch there is another strategy that says, well, let this thing go on its own course and die on the vine of hits own accord. i m not sure it happened that way. listen, to charlie gasparino s point, you may have the president the same for three years the argument is are we going to let insurance companies go out of business an nobody has health insurance? and it s going to be a tough proposition. ben just said we knew it was going to be a wealth transfer, that s true. we did not know we
be subs diekz it as single men who is a grown adult that make $45 grand a year, somehow we would be on the hook to pay these premiums. the young people sign up, it is ludicrous they are not signing up. by the way, it will blow up a lot sooner tan social security will. this could go off in the next couple years. i will flip this around. i think the approach on democrats and republicans will be to let this run. you say die of its own accord. i say it will be allowed to run. it will get better, more people will sign up, more young people will sign up. that s the hook, i talked to a lot of the architects behind this. by the way, i admire the one was encyst i m one of the architects behind this, it was sort of like saying, yeah, my building fell down, i m the guy that built it. nevertheless, they are saying, look, give this time. the number and the trend is our friend. do you honestly buy that? because even assuming you get millions more to sign up, millions more are going to continue t
idiots. it takes a few bad eggs to spoil it for us all. ben, what do you think of this? i don t go to restaurants that cost $210 a person. i ll leave that to you, neil, with your private jets. if i was at a restaurant paying that much money and had a screaming 8-month-old kid next to me i would lose my mind. parents who bring kids that age at ap restaurant at that level have to bedimented in some serious way have to be demented on a serious level. i hate this. not nice. kick the kid out? throw them out. throw the kid out and keep the parents there? no. parents need to have common sense. this isn t a nantive state issue. the chef is behaving responsibly and the parents weren t. you would accept putting a limit on kids at a restaurant. certainly like that. exactly. i don t know if there is a legal issue. charles, what do you say?
that, quite the legitimate fears a lot of folks have, the numbers aren t adding up, they re worried they re going to go astronomically high. this is a bailout, let s be clear in every sense of the word. people at home don t want to or have time to dig through the number, i m trying to wrap my mind around this, but we are looking at if fact if the insureers underperform by 8% or more that the government then steps in and covers 80 pors of those costs and by the way, it s the other way around, too. if the insureers outporp by 8% or more, they have to share 80% of the profit with them. this is a profit by any sense of the word. i can guarantee you the left will come up to say this is not a bailout by definition. i have no idea what she said, but i m so what does the mean? i think you can consider it a bailout if taxes go up. if costs go up, that is not going to happen.