you ask it again, or a second time or a third time or a fourth time. most transparent white house in history, so they claim, has yet to produce a budget. the minute you make a dig like that, the minute you re not going to answer a kwechlt you stick to what the issue is and you know you re both playing equal, but the fact he has to make a dig at him as if he s doing something wrong, shows that he s on to something. this is appointed aggressive line of questioning, not know where near out of bounds to, but for him to use that as an excuse to go after the fox thewes channel, there are other reporters, some of them who do take appointed aggressive approach with carney. he never singles out their networks, but he did to fox. jon: we have to take a break. first, if you want to keep up the media stories, go to our website, watch list section. up next, is it important how the media label a killer? terror strikes in norway, a lone killer, a rampage killing
white house, tough questions. unleashing an attack in norway, bombing and shooting innocents in. and making media headlines tying him to the christian right. is that fair? and more faith base accusations and cnn ayn corps defends himself after what he knew when. and checkbook journalism tactics, are they kidding? is this guy the right choice to be the new anchor at msnbc? on the panel this week, writer and fox news contributor judy miller. radio talk show host, monica crowley. jim pinkerton american editor conservative magazine and kirsten power. i m host jon scott. fox news watch is on right now.
norway, anders bravic, killed at least 76 people in the scandanavian norway. he objects to the presence of muslims in europe. and on sunday s headline, as horrors emerged, norway charges christian extremist, a number of other news organizations like l.a. times and reuters played up the christian angle. bravic is not a christian, that s impossible. no one believing in jesus commits mass murder. the man might have called himself a christian on the net, but he is certainly not of that faith. . jon: fox news bill o reilly this week calling out the new york times and others in the mainstream media how they labeled the radical extremist who terrorized norway last week and o reilly got a lot of criticism from the comments. really? yeah, he did. that s strange because pains me to say this, agree with bill o reilly with that statement 100%, that s
a real question, and if they won t answer, you go back and you ask it again, or a second time or a third time or a fourth time. most transparent white house in history, so they claim, has yet to produce a budget. the minute you make a dig like that, the minute you re not going to answer a kwechlt you stick to what the issue is and you know you re both playing equal, but the fact he has to make a dig at him as if he s doing something wrong, shows that he s on to something. this is appointed aggressive line of questioning, not know where near out of bounds to, but for him to use that as an excuse to go after the fox thewes channel, there are other reporters, some of them who do take appointed aggressive approach with carney. he never singles out their networks, but he did to fox. jon: we have to take a break. first, if you want to keep up the media stories, go to our website, watch list section. up next, is it important how the media label a killer? terror strikes in norway, a
tonight a mass murder in norway, anders bravic, killed at least 76 people in the scandanavian norway. he objects to the presence of muslims in europe. and on sunday s headline, as horrors emerged, norway charges christian extremist, a number of other news organizations like l.a. times and reuters played up the christian angle. bravic is not a christian, that s impossible. no one believing in jesus commits mass murder. the man might have called himself a christian on the net, but he is certainly not of that faith. . jon: fox news bill o reilly this week calling out the new york times and others in the mainstream media how they labeled the radical extremist who terrorized norway last week and o reilly got a lot of criticism from the comments. really? yeah, he did. that s strange because pains me to say this, agree with bill o reilly with that