effect. the federal courts live on traditions, the president here says that you don t put a statute in place when it would be unconstitutional. right now roe v. wade is the law of the land in this country at least until the supreme court looks at it this term in the mississippi case. jurisprudence says texas sb-8 should be blocked going into effect while it s being tested in the court. the fifth circuit is chosen to revert the district judge and remaining in effects while judicial proceedings go this way. it s unusual. it feels like there is a second jurisprudence for the fifth circuit right now. u.s. attorney joyce vance, thank you so much for your expertise. we appreciate it. let s turn to mike and john,
appeals broke that restricted abortion law will remain in effect. doj can now appeal the ruling to the u.s. supreme court. twists and turns around this law and legal rulings around it. where does this head next? what does it look like the fate of this abortion law? well, doj will continue to fight this battle, perhaps going to the supreme court. it s interesting to note that the fifth circuit panel was not unanimous. they split 2-1 along the political line which is a concept that i hate discussing. the political split is notable. this runs contrary to jurisprudence on preliminary injunction. this is procedural motion. should texas sb-8 go into