Saz Transformational Statute News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Argue is the purpose of the statute as opposed to its language? no. i wouldn t say necessarily the purpose. i think that immigration law has always as the supreme court said you always have to look to relevant factors and understand what does congress deem relevant and what not? i think when you ask yourself that question nationality is now no longer such a factor. this saz transformational statute in 1965 passed with the voting rights act. that is why. that s on the 1152 argument. i don t want the court to lose sight of the 1182 which looks like it is a broad statute but it does ultimately supplant the more specific fine grained ten factor test that congress laid down and the government itself has said to the supreme court in the marx case that when you have a more specific statute that ....

Supreme Court , Immigration Law , Question Nationality , Saz Transformational Statute , Voting Rights Act , Factor Test ,