And i thought the threat to our nation was well articulated earlier today by Professor Feldman when you said, if we cannot impeach a president who abuses his office for personal advantage, we no longer live in a democracy, we live in a monarchy or we live under a districtatorship. My view is if people cannot depend on the fairness of our elections, then what people are calling divisive today will be absolutely nothing compared to the shredding of our democracy. After the events of ukraine unfolded, the president claimed that the reason he requested an investigation into his political opponents and withheld desperately needed military aid for ukraine was supposedly because he was worried about corruption. However, contrary to president s statements, various witnesses, including Vice President pences special adviser jennifer williams, testified that the president s request was political. Take a listen. I found the july 25th phone call unusual because in contrast to other president ial ca
never give up. they always go to the l never give up. they always go to the end. they always win. we are going to definitely win, we just need a little more time. to definitely win, we ust need a little more time. to definitely win, we ust need a little more time. emotions were still raw when little more time. emotions were still raw when joshua little more time. emotions were still raw when joshua attended l little more time. emotions were i still raw when joshua attended the still raw whenjoshua attended the press conference. it is still raw when joshua attended the press conference. press conference. it is really, really hard press conference. it is really, really hard for press conference. it is really, really hard for me press conference. it is really, really hard for me to - press conference. it is really, really hard for me to say - press conference. it is really, really hard for me to say i ml press conference. it is really, - really hard for me to say i m proud o
professor, i m just an old criminal defense attorney. but when i walk into a courtroom i think of three things. what is the crime charged, what is the con duck and who is the victim. and we manage to make it until 5:00 before we ve talked about the alleged victim of the crime. and that is president zelensky. and three different times president zelensky at least three different times has denied being pressured by the president. the call shows laughter, pleasantries, cordiality. september 25th president zelensky states, no, you heard that we had a good phone call. it was normal. we spoke about many things. i think you read it and nobody pushed me. october 10th president zelensky had say press conference and i encourage everybody to watch it, even if you don t understand it, 90% of communications nonverbal, you tell me if you think he s lying. there was no blackmail. december 2nd, this monday, i never talked to the president from the position of quid pro quo.