Item 2, 20154109c02 at 333 12th street, proposed ford continuance to march 5th, 2020 and item 3, number 2016 2016006860 ika at 65 ocean avenue, inkind agreement for continuance until april 2nd, 2020. Further commissioners, under your regular calendar, item 12, 12576 1769 lombard street requesting a continuance for a medical condition that came up and under the discretionary review, item 16, 2017010281 zrp at 23 236 el camino it is propod for continuance to march 12th, 2019 and 1769 proposed for continuance to march 5th. I have to speaker cards. Would any members of the public like to comment on the items proposed for continuance, come on up. Im representing the business opener for 1769 lombard street. I just wanted to elaborate more, the request is very sudden and unexpected. So i had been working with the project sponsor to prepare for today, you know, we communicated as late as yesterday morning. I did not hear back from them yesterday afternoon or evening and then i heard back from
The department of Public Health, its not quite like a restaurant, right . The potential impact could be potentially much more serious, depending on the use that it is. And so if i understand correctly, the discomfort is more about our process in reviewing the environmental consequences of permitting this and whether we have reviewed everything and we know that its okay. My only concern we dont have the expertise to understand whether a particular hood would work in a particular situation. We have to rely on the expertise of the other agencies for that, right . So i dont know its typically not a level of detail we would get into at this level of entitlement. But thats the challenge im suggesting. Thats why fairly routine for us to have, within a categorical exemption, rely on existing codes and policies, existing code language that invites and requires other agencies to be involved and their codes would kick in. I think we are getting into that level of the entitlement phase of a projec
They will be moving out, and moving forward, its my understanding that its to be used, the 235,000 cost or the gap that mohcd has for developing housing, times that by the 150 and thats how we got the number. Commissioner richards okay. I wondered. Every single live work unit that was approved in San Francisco has an n. S. R. On it and saying its not housing, its commercial. And so academy put students in the housing pardon me in the buildings and considered it to be student housing, but they didnt comply with the law oliv on livework units. There were units that were abandoned, and there were more on harrison street. So they were not housing at that time because they were not conforming housing. That w they were both substantial buildings. President melgar thank you, miss hester. Mr. Adams, did you want to explain the methodology further . Dan adams, mohcd. Scott sanchez explanation was spot on. Commissioner richards we had a case here probably three or four units where essex trust le
I will go to the chairs report. To my colleagues and members of this past weekend was the fifth annual world day of remembrance for traffic victims in San Francisco. While i was not able to attend i want to think president yee, supervisor mandelman for honoring the victims and families of those killed and injured by these avoidable crashes and for shining a light on the need to reduce speeding. So far, this year, in 201926 people have died in traffic collisions in contrast to the 23 fatalities in all of 2018. Of this years total, 15 People Killed were pedestrians and one was a cyclist. Almost 600 people have been injured in 2019. Our work to deliver vision zero quick work projects more expensively and quickly throughout the city continues and thankfully we will be aided by our collective efforts to get crop d passed earlier this month. The very first surcharge in the state of health when he will bring in an estimated 32 35 million annually to fund Critical Infrastructure investments li
Avenue, conditional use authorization. Good evening. Department staff. Of about you is a request for conditional use authorization to legalize an existing 10,000 square foot industrial agricultural use at 1465 donner avenue. It is a preexisting operation with temporary authorization from the office of cannabis to continue operation while legitamizing. It is in the Zoning District and the bayview area plan. It requires an authorization under 2010. 3. The establishment to cultivate cannabis. This site also includes an unpermitted second floor. The applicant also applied for a variance to legalize. After working with their architect and city staff, the applicant has withdrawn that request and proposes to remove the second floor and render the site back into compliance with 145. 5 of the planning code. The department has received no correspondence regarding this application. This site is a preexisting use which is legitamizing and will be required to comply with the office of Cannabis Lice