reason has to do with toxic stress. and for those who don t know, toxic stress shows in people who are exposed to trauma, violence, much like what we re dealing with in the city, the number of shootings that we ve had in this entire city. so, it s not a surprise that the numbers would be very high when we think about how many shootings we ve had in the bayview and visitacion valley neighborhood alone. it is of epidemic proportion. so, i want to give some voice to what supervisor kim has raised. i think she s nailed it, which is interesting, because i ve come to the conclusion to support laura s law because of that, because we need to provide support for people who are hurting. i appreciate the efforts of the colleague bringing this issue forward to the forefront where hundreds of individuals are suffering from mental illness. many who i see encounter my district and quite frankly who i have in my own family. many of the people that i seek to help are unable to recognize their
debate and i was ultimately persuaded at that time because the leadership of the department of public health, dr. mitch katz, for those of you who remember that time, he was opposed to moving forward because he didn t think that laura alps ~ laura s law could be effectively implemented. today we have department of public health leadership that think differently, that are ready to implement assistive treatment. and we should give our mental health experts time to do t. that being said, we should put together the best program we can. i do want to thank supervisor farrell for his leadership and advocates who who are moving forward because, as supervisor cohen said, we do have to do things differently. and i do support that. i just want to make sure we do it with the strongest program possible. thank you. supervisor kim. thank you. i just wanted to clarify my earlier comments. my point was not that there are more mental health illnesses documented in the african-american an
excuse me, this is not the time for public comment. i will mention, i will mention that public comment has already happened on this. [speaker not understood]. deputy sheriff? thank you, sir. [speaker not understood]. madam clerk, could you please call the roll on item 57? on item 57, supervisor cohen? thank you, aye. cohen aye. supervisor farrell? farrell aye. supervisor kim? kim aye. supervisor mar? mar aye. supervisor tang? tang aye. supervisor wiener? wiener aye. supervisor yee? yee aye. supervisor avalos? avalos aye. supervisor breed? breed aye. supervisor campos? campos aye. supervisor chiu? chiu aye. there are 11 ayes. the ordinance is passed on the first read. [gavel] next item. item 58 is an ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuit filed by mark morgan against the city and county of san francisco for $238,000; the lawsuit was filed on november 2, 2011, in san francisco superior court, case no. cgc-11-515615; entitled mark morgan vs. city a
supervisor breed? breed aye. supervisor campos? campos aye. supervisor chiu? chiu aye. there are 11 ayes. the ordinance is passed on the first read. [gavel] next item. item 58 is an ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuit filed by mark morgan against the city and county of san francisco for $238,000; the lawsuit was filed on november 2, 2011, in san francisco superior court, case no. cgc-11-515615; entitled mark morgan vs. city and county of san francisco, et al. ~ in superior court. same house same call? this ordinance is passed on the first read. [gavel] item 59. item 59 is an ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuit filed by joseph luebberke against the city and county of san francisco for 100,000; the lawsuit was filed on january 21, 2011, in san francisco superior court, case no. cgc-11-507528; entitled joseph luebberke vs. city and county of san francisco. ~ in superior court. same house, same call? this ordinance is passed on first read. [g
didn t want to show me. but they weren t going to burn those paintings either, right. they were critical for the works and would go on to their acclaim and i started to wonder about whether these paintings, these potentially failed works were not just critical for the creative process but for the indentures and entrepreneurial feats we all celebrate. i wanted to understand that it wasn t about a cliche. rose: hillary clinton s hard choices and sarah lewis case for failure when we continue. there s a saying around here: you stand behind what you say. around here, we don t make excuses, we make commitments. and when you can t live up to them, you own up and make it right. some people think the kind of accountability that thrives on so many streets in this country has gone missing in the places where it s needed most. but i know you ll still find it, when you know where to look. captioning sponsored by rose communications from our studios in new york city, this is charlie r