Comes to you then goes to the president. The important point of your job is to filter, and not in a good way, because he only has so many hours in the day, and you have to make judgments about what he has to know so that he is prepared, so for me, the day started at 3 30 in the morning, and i cant speak for you, but i was up at that time to shower and go to the gym and address, and i was in the car by fire lot. Longer for the president would get information, there was interaction within the Intelligence Community. There were questions that i thought should be added to things, so it was the process to get the right information to him in a timely way that is holy integrated and comprehensive. So he is not getting a single review, but the lease and integrated one. It would not be inaccurate to describe this time as a time after 9 11. There was a way that we changed how we did security quite a bit. We change the way we think about intelligence and in my particular view, you see the massive
Off near the finish line of the race. At 8 00 eastern, a discussion with journalists who won the Pulitzer Prize for their coverage. Members of congress, it is my great privilege and high honor and personal pleasure to present , hamadhis excellency karzai, resident to the Islamic State of afghanistan. President to the Islamic State of afghanistan. [applause] thank you. Thank you. Thank you very much. Thanks a lot. Please. Thank you for the great honor. Speaker, mr. Vice president , members of congress, distinguished guests, the great people of the United States of honora, it is my distinct to speak on behalf of the Afghan People in this assembly. I think you and the people of this great country for your generosity and commitment to our people. You have supported us with your resources, with your leadership in the worlds community. With theimportantly precious lives of your shoulders of your soldiers. Quick find more highlights from 35 years of house coverage. Cspan, created by americas
People are keeping track of you, let alone every time you use an email on massive accounts. To make an informed judgment about the nsa programs, we have to know what they are. I want to spend a lot of the time during our our talking about what those particular programs are, how they work, etc. But first, since we are hosting this at a political theory institute, i would like to start by asking a few normative questions around which i think all the others will revolve. So what i want to do, i will ask my first question to each of you now, so you will have a few seconds to think while im asking the other. First, what right do you have to publish secrets determined to be such by our duly constituted political authorities . How can you justify supplanting your own judgment for that of the peoples government . And for general hayden, there is a parallel question. What right does the nsa or any other governmental body have to keep secrets in the first place . Democracy is based on consent an