Live Breaking News & Updates on Samsungv Ericsson

Stay updated with breaking news from Samsungv ericsson. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.

China emerges as a key litigation venue for standard essential patents


ZTE v Conversant and
OPPO v Sharp. All of the parties involved in the cases are active players in the telecommunication SEP field. Such a SEP ruling boom emphasises the growing importance of China as a SEP litigation venue.
One of the reasons for such flourishment of SEP litigation is the great development of telecommunication companies in China. From the 2G to 5G era, SEPs owned by Chinese enterprises have soared from less than 10% to over 30% of all declared SEPs. From another perspective, China also has a giant market for manufacturing and selling phones, which is attracting SEP implementers. Therefore, courts in China are holding relatively balanced and tolerant spirits, with no injunction to issue as principle. Courts do not intend to force those implementers to withdraw from the market, but just hope to help move forward licensing negotiations. This is the philosophy in fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory (FRAND) injunctions in the ....

United Kingdom , Liu Shen , Samsungv Ericsson , Huaweiv Samsung , Ericsson Seps , Guanyang Yao , Xiaoning Yu , Wuhan Intermediate Court , Supreme Court Ip Tribunal , Astronautics University , China University Of Political Science , Tsinghua University , Guangdong High Court , John Marshall Law School , China National Intellectual Property Administration , Supreme Court , Shenzhen Intermediate Court , Liu Shen Associates , Euromoney Institutional Investor , United Kingdom Supreme Court , Shenzhen Intermediate Courts , Xiaomi Wuhan , Beijing Aeronautics , Marshall Law , China University , Political Science ,

Tracking the evolution of standard essential patents in China


Tracking the evolution of standard essential patents in China
Shan Jiao of Lifang & Partners explores how standard essential patents litigation in China has evolved following recent developments in the area
Sponsored by
April 14 2021
lifanChina has attracted significant attention for its handling of standard essential patents (SEPs), arising from the battles over anti-suit injunctions (ASI) and anti-anti-suit injunctions (AASI), as seen in
Huawei v Conversant,
Samsung v Ericsson.
This article provides a legislative background of the debate over SEPs in China and considers some of the key recent developments in judicial practice.
Legislative background of SEP litigation in China
As China is a civil law system, there are two types of sources that are binding on Chinese courts and are cited by judges in their decisions. One type is legislation and the other type is judicial interpretatio ....

Shan Jiao , Li Fang , Samsungv Ericsson , Huaweiv Samsung , Qihoov Tencent , Xiaomiv Sisvel , National Development , Wuhan Intermediate Court , Reform Commission , People Court , District Court , Supreme People Court , Wuhan Court , Shenzhen Court , Columbia Law School , Ministry Of Commerce , Shenzhen Intermediate Court , Euromoney Institutional Investor , Supreme People , Contract Law , Patent Law , Anti Monopoly Law , Standardization Law , Interpretations Concerning Certain Issues , Patent Infringement , Beijing High People ,