of six nations title tilt? i it will be in england, ireland sort of six nations title tilt? of six nations title tilt? i think we all know of six nations title tilt? i think we all know that of six nations title tilt? i think we all know that predicting - of six nations title tilt? i think| we all know that predicting the of six nations title tilt? i think- we all know that predicting the six nations is never sensible. of course when we are doing this to sam russia everyone thought england would win. the last ones that everyone ended up thinking about was wales and they were the ones that went on that incredible run. in 2022, yes. from current form you say england and ireland of the favourites from a home nations. actually it s francis update bp all blacks in a real thriller in paris on saturday. they are the ones to keep a close eye on for that you feel they are building very nicely towards their home world cup in 2023. very nicely towards their home world cuo in 2023- very nice
fourth of july weekend rereading the russia hoax so that i am ready to use my 5 minutes well. jason: very good. congressman turner, i do not expect you to lay out the questions that you will ask in advance, but you have a very important role. you have dedicated a big part of your career and time in d.c. on the national intelligence front and the military side. a little bit off-topic but very much related, there is an opportunity cost when the intel committee is so focused as adam schiff does on russia, russia, russia, but focusing on donald, donald, donald. explain to people the opportunity cost because you have limited time and resources at the committee. what are the congress not doing that they should be doing in the meantime? exactly, adam schiff obviously will be in nirvana during all of this, because he has been pursuing at the entire time when he should be pursuing instead of donald trump and his obsession with donald trump as
investigation of president trump s interactions or his campaign s alleged interactions with russia that predated mueller, and even in that investigation peter strzok and lisa page text to one another that there is no there there. there is no evidence. and it is entirely appropriate to open those doors by asking what evidence robert mueller and the special counsel review that might ve been tainted or miscast as a result of its development by people who had a known bias against president trump. i think looking at the work that mueller did in his report, we will have to look at what were the inputs and what were the potential pollutants to the inputs regarding political bias. and i think that a lot of this was miscast and developed by people in the obama white house like clapper, brendan, that s why the work of the inspector general as well as the work of attorney general barr are so important to make sure that we find out who was responsible for the terrible lie for two years. so i will
the mueller report reviewed the evidence and came to the conclusion that there was no evidence of conclusion, and obviously it does not conclude that the president committed a crime. but i think that mueller weakens his cart ability when you read the report. when he includes statements as we do not exonerate the president. mueller only gets its authority from that delegate in the attorney general and the department of justice. and nobody in the department of justice has the ability to exonerate anyone. it is just ingenuous. it does it just shows his bias, he wants to leave the impression that his report impugns a present and even though he can find nothing that the president has done. jason: you bring up a good point. and greg, i want to ask you, there are a lot of things that mueller did not look at. if you look at the instructions on what he was supposed to do, how did he exclude so many things? how is it possible that you can investigate russian interference in our election with
china. iran, russia, north korea, real threats that we have two our country and how they are evolving and what is china doing in hakki, what are the threats to the infrastructure? what is the intelligence committee doing with respect to what iran is doing with their weapons program? what are racing with russia and their attempts to undermine democracies in eastern europe? all of these are areas that our staff should be spending time on. adam schiff should be spending time on, and the committee should be spending time on. it makes us less safe. jason: it is absolutely a point that i hope everybody digests and understands when adam schiff and the democrats do this, it really is a distraction. because what they are doing as they are trying to distract from some other things that they should be working on. so to gregg jarrett, congressman gates, congressman turner, thank you very much for your expertise tonight. thank you for joining us. directly ahead, the 2020 democrats open borders on