arms. so that is why again, this visit shows that we are as serious as we can be about negotiations that strengthens the hand. jason: china will have to be a part of the sam russia as well. really quickly, charlie, the one thing you learned from secretary pompeo. it was so interesting to hear them talk about the way that donald trump approaches this in an unconventional way as dan pointed out. this is a president that is willing to spend political capital in willing to achieve a huge victory. and you do not see that in most politicians. most politicians the only capital they spend is to get themselves reelected. this is a guy who is willing to spend it to accomplish big things. jason: if you want different results, you have to do things differently. that s why the president is successful. dan, charlie, thank you. we appreciate you joining us. chaos in the streets of portland, oregon, with antifa attacking yet again another conservative. trace gallagher will be here with the repor
negotiations to denuclearize the peninsula with out to the supreme leader. he used a little bit of the political capital that he has painstakingly tried to get it to jump-start to those negotiations. it may strain credulity for some that kim jong un is willing to barter away his icbm in nuclear capability of her food, energy, and immigration in the world economy, but one thing i learned for many years at the cia is that there is nothing certain in intelligence or foreign policy. the president has framed the debate. the onus is on kim jong un to walk through the doors as john bolton likes to say and start negotiations. if kim jong un does not do that, he will face more sanctions. and we will have the backing from others in the security council at the u.n. to do so. jason: dan, i have just seconds left, and i want to get both of you in. but dan, can anything happen without china? we need china, we need russia to help us enforce the sanctions. kim jong un is exporting coal and cheap l
for? johnny mention collusion between the trump campaign in russia, we do know one campaign was getting dirt from russia, did mueller bother to find out whether the russian government was feeding that dirt through christopher steele to fusion gps? did he even ask? and the legal issue is really important, and johnny just touched on it, if you can resist on the unlawful arrest, can you really obstruct and i m predicated investigation? which it is important where mueller began, and i don t think he began by figuring out the origins of the russia probe as it relates to trump. but we will find out. prepare, set to low expectations, it is 5 minutes. it is impossible to unlock the mysteries of the world in 5 minutes. i wish that they were not having the hearing. i m really glad that we got a good lawyer like johnny radcliffe on judiciary. jason: you just pour all of the questions into that bucket, but gentlemen, it was a pleasure and an honor to serve with all
his findings will be significant, jason, because it presents a real potential problem for the democrats. right now we already know bob mueller has told us that a democratic administration started an investigation into a conspiracy with russia that did not exist. that is bad enough. it would be a whole lot worse if it turns out that that same democratic administration continued that investigation by breaking rules of the fisa court. if that happens, you can pretty much put a pin in any impeachment balloon, because it would be hard for the democrats to say, well, we started an investigation that we should not have. we continued it by breaking the rules, but we want to impeach a president for trying to obstruct that investigation that never should have started. jason: congressman gowdy, let s go back to director mueller who is there to testify. you are no longer on the committee that would be questioning him. what are the democrats up to? why would they do this? if you were on the repub