Stay updated with breaking news from S appointees. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Anything informally? as i said, i don t recognise the characterisation of dominic s behaviour personally and i was not aware and i m not aware of any formal complaints about that. that is an example of not answering a question that s. a question there that is an example of not answering a question there has been suggestions dominic raab has been fairly difficult to work with, those around him dismissed it amounts to bullying. the spokesman said when the stories were emerging the other day he has high standards, works hard and expects a lot from his team as well as from himself. this the third question, if you like, that s been asked of one of mr sunak s appointees to government, after the row about 6avin williamson who was false to resign and the reappointment of suella braverman as home secretaryjust reappointment of suella braverman as home secretary just six reappointment of suella braverman as home secretaryjust six days after she resigned from that same job. some ongoing questions ....
Great deal of pride and pleasure in the exoneration of the president. there s no other word for it. the exoneration for any involvement with the collusion with russia, any sort of conspiracy to violate the law with russian interests. that is an unambiguous victory for the president. on obstruction of justice, i think they are spinning the facts as lawyers do in a favorable way for their client. the decision not to charge or accuse the president of obstruction of justice was not made by robert mueller. it was made by the president s appointees, william barr and rod rosenstein. that doesn t mean it s a wrong conclusion, but it is a very different thing from an independent conclusion. second, their assertion that you can only have obstruction of justice if it s proven that there is an underlying crime is simply incorrect under the law. it is often the case that there is an underlying crime, and that ....
This good work continues to go on by the president s appointees. paul: i would add the education secretary has basically withdrawn the guidance which allowed the kangaroo courts on sexual assault accusations to take place on college campuses. one thing we learned from .betsy devos is how much of the education department was operating under guidance which isn t even a regulation, let alone a statutory authority. she repealed that guidance. she also may repeal a guidance m school discipline that also was having destructive consequences in making schools to focus more on political goals than disbeeline that actually works to discipline that actually works to change behavior. i think we re seeing the repealo of those guidances and subregulatory advice pieces get taken off the books as well. paul: that really comes under theff media radar which is focud so much on the mueller probe and ....
About the chief of staff is talking about the supreme court that way. but i want to get back to the panel of cpac. after mr. priebus discussed your nomination, steve bannon talked about the president s agenda. he described three preorts, and one of them was, quote, the dee construction of the administrative state. here s what mr. bannon meant by that. he said regulation was a problem [ inaudible ]. quote, every business leader we ve had in is saying not just taxes, but it is also regulation. he said that if you look at the president s appointees, quote, they were selected for a reason, and that is deconstruction. the way the progressive left runs is if they can t get it passed, they re just going to put in some sort of regulation and an agency. that s all going to be [ inaudible ] it s all going to be deconstructed. taking steve bannon at his word, do you think only cabinet appointees are selected to bring about this deconstruction? or do you think the white house ....