provisional ruling on a case against israel, a case of genocide, the judge in the court did a super millinery rulings. i think we might now be able to take a little listen to what the judge had to say earlier. at to what the “udge had to say earlier. , , , . earlier. at the present stage in the proceedings. earlier. at the present stage in the proceedings. the earlier. at the present stage in the proceedings, the court earlier. at the present stage in the proceedings, the court is earlier. at the present stage in the proceedings, the court is not - proceedings, the court is not required to ascertain whether any violations of israel s obligations under the genocide convention have occurred. such a finding could only be made by the court at the stage of the examination of the merits of the present case. at this age are making order on the request for an indication of provisional measures, the court s task is to establish whether the acts and omissions complained of
only to highlight the court s own impotence in the fact of an america whose cries for equality resound. meanwhile, presidentjoe biden called the ruling a severe disappointment. here s more of what he had to say: i believe that while talent, creativity and hard work everywhere in the country, not equal opportunity. it is not everywhere in this country. we can t let the decision be the last word. earlier i spoke to us secretary of education miguel cardona on the impact of today s decision. thank you forjoining us on bbc news. you ve written today puzzling decision was that the country back decades.- country back decades. what im act country back decades. what impact do country back decades. what impact do you country back decades. what impact do you think - country back decades. what impact do you think it ll - country back decades. what| impact do you think it ll have couege impact do you think it ll have college admissions? physicians today took away a very important
but controversial rwanda policy had a new roadblock today, with the appeal court including the east african country is not safe enough for the uk to send asylum seekers there. but the lord chiefjustice, lord burnett, announced it had been a split decision. he thinks rwanda is safe, but his two colleagues did not. deficiencies in the asylum system in rwanda are such that there are substantial grounds for believing that there is a real risk that persons sent to remand it will be returned to their home countries, where they face persecution or other inhumane treatment, when in fact, they have a good claim for asylum. in that sense, rwanda is not a safe third country. the government will be disappointed by today s majorityjudgment a blow for the home secretary, who s expressed her personal enthusiasm for getting flights to rwanda started as soon as possible. but that s not the end of the legaljourney the matter will almost certainly now move to the supreme court for a final h