in many different cases and cooperated hoping that there is trust and that they will not be outed. otherwise, we can t count on receiving information in the future. but, you know, the truth is, i ve seen the documents. this president is for declassification. every time he tries to declassify something, it ends up backfiring. i m more concerned about the precedent of a person being investigated, being able to order declassification selectively because he thinks it helps him. that s not how a rule of law country works. we know the president though said listen, this is all about transparency. fit was broader, would that work for you? if it wasn t as selective as you say it in your words? well, the problem with how he views transparency is i think he thinks an on going investigation should have the facts that came forward so far put out in the public. that is not how investigations work. you don t let subjects of investigations dictate the terms of investigations. now let me also just
has concluded its investigation. the republicans on that committee lead by nunes said they would release the transcripts, that never happened. he has no interest in telling him to put forward the evidence we collected. to me, it seems more self serving. the larger issue here is it is violating the rule of law and the independence of the department of justice must show. in terms of that, we know how divisive the investigation was in the house. obviously. but is that something that you would make a push for in going to devin nunes and saying if that this is what we re supposed to see, put it out there? chairmane nunes said he was going to release the transcripts. again, we re waiting. we believe the public will see you pushed for that? that is my question? yes. going after him and saying let s see it and his response to you? credit to frpg are airanking. won t look us in the eyes when