Article content
In its capacity as an interested party, Gorubso submitted a written response to the Administrative Court on April 16, 2021, arguing that the NGO lacks legal standing to bring the License Appeal, no evidence has been provided to support the allegations made, and the facts known to Gorubso contradict the allegations made. Gorubso’s response further argues that even if there was evidence to support the allegations made it would not result in a nullity of the Tintyava License, the Ministry satisfied all procedural requirements in the issuance of the Tintyava License, and there were no flaws in the administrative acts of the Ministry that could result in a nullification of the Tintyava License. Additionally, Gorubso requested that the Administrative Court add Tintyava Exploration as an interested party to the License Appeal, on the basis that Tintyava Exploration is the current holder of the Tintyava License.