prosecuting key leaders of both countries deemed most responsible for the war and its horrors as well as many of the perpetrators who executed those policies. to discuss this, we will hear from dr. peter mcguire, who will discuss the prosecutions that took place in europe. weinberg,dr. gerhard who will be covering the trials in asia. i inviteake of timing, you all to read their biographies in the back of your programs as my doing so from the podium takes up our presenters valuable speaking time as well as your opportunity to ask them questions afterwards. please find your cell phones now and make sure the rigors are turned off so as not to disrupt the presenters or your neighbors experience could affor. before dr. mcguire takes the podium, it is my pleasure to give you the first oral showcase of the 2016 conference. ande are archival footage images with oral history interviews in the museum collection. conductingrk from the interviews to editing and producing the final piece
director of research and history. i m asked they come in a mustard surmise. move to thepowers rather unprecedented step of prosecuting key leaders both countries, as well as many of the perpetrators executing those policies. we ll hear from dr. peter will discuss the prosecutions that took place in europe, and then dr. weinberg will be covering the trials and asia. i invite you all to read their biographies in the back of the program. you can ask questions afterward. please find your cell phones now and make sure the rigors are turned off to not disrupt presenters or your neighbors experience. before dr. mcguire takes the podium it is my pleasure to the showcase of the conference. the showcases combined archival footage and images with oral interviews. conducting the interviews, to editing, to producing the final piece you are about to see is done by members of my team in the research department. without any further purdue, here is the number trials. i was one of three offi
february 14, at 4 p.m. eastern. this coming tuesday is the first of the nature new hampshire primary. next political science professor andrew smith teaches a class on the history of the primary and its significance in the presidential election process. we recorded the class at the university of new hampshire in 2011. his class is about an hour and 15 minutes. professor smith: welcome. today people talk about the history of the new hampshire primary. before we get into the history, i want to talk for a bit about the history of the nomination process en toto. how do we nominate the candidates for president? the thing i want to talk about overall, first off, giving you a sense of the new hampshire primary. it did not start with the first presidential primary. i will talk about how it developed in importance over the years, particularly since 1952. the third part i will focus on is efforts to bump new hampshire out of its slot is the first primary. how those things happened. wh
developed in importance over the years, particularly since 1952. the third part i will focus on are efforts to bump new hampshire out of its slot is the first primary. how those things happened. what was done to respond to them in particular, that the , secretary of state is required by law to set the primary date of new hampshire s primary one week before any similar contest. later on this week secretary of state gardner will be coming to talk about these issues. at one time we had a saying this is always first, always right. it is not always right. the candidate who will become the eventual nominee or president does not always have to win the new hampshire primary. we will talk about that a when talk about that a little bit as well as we go on. when did primary start and what happened? first of all, there s nothing in the constitution about nominating candidates for president. the constitution is pretty quiet on how we choose who the nominees are going to be. article ii,
history of the new hampshire primary. ,efore we get into the history i want to talk for a bit about the history of the nomination process. how do we nominate the candidates for president. the think and want to talk about overall, first off, giving you a sense of the new hampshire primary. it did not start with the first president of primary. i will talk about how it developed in importance over the years. particularly since 1952. the third part i will focus on is efforts to bump new hampshire out of its slot is the first primary. how those things happened. what was done to respond to them in particular, that the secretary of state is required by law to set the primary date of new hampshire one week before any similar contest. later on this week secretary of state geithner will be coming to talk about secretary the secretary of state will be coming to discuss these issues. thise time we had a saying is always first, always right. it is not always right. the candidate who w