total confidence that the fisa process was followed and that the entire case was handled in a thoughtful, responsible way by doj and the fbi. i think the notion fisa was abused as nonsense. sean: nonsense yet another like comey knew it was garbage and unverifiable rumors and speculation and he was warned multiple times. and even christopher steele under oath when he heard this he should have gone back. i have no idea of any of it is true. that is why he repeatedly denied that it was used with the bulk of information in the fisa applications that we now know also was a lie. that means devin nunes was rig right, and that means graham was right and the schiff show, he lied repeatedly too. take a look. you call the dossier unverified, salacious. why did you use that for the fisa court for carter page? no one used it but you lead with
the mainstream media reporting that he provided evidence of a quid pro quo involving military aid is false. neither he or any other witness has provided testimony that the ukrainian military aid wasti beg withheld, you cannot have a quid pro quo with no quote. within two minutes he destroyed the witness. there is no quid pro quo. democracy being hijacked by adam schiff and the democrats. the president being impeached in secret in the party has no rig right, this is un-american, the whole process is a threat to the republic. donald trump is expressing frustration when he s using the word lynching. if it s been used before in the 90s a lot. even if the president should be impeached history is going to question whether or not this is just the partisan lynching or whether a not it was something
starting to scrub his past, rig right, and i think it is fascinating socialism and late term abortion two things that the president talked about that i think will be real lightning rods in the next years. and those will be things that trump comes back to. he essentially accused the governor of murder in his state of the union address which was a pretty remarkable thing. and it wasn t just bloggers, it was an old class mats mate of h was turned off by those comments. was it? i believe so. we ll have to check that. but it was the abortion comments that began the whole series of events. precisely. and it has created this house of cards and it was the procespectf the lieutenant governor maybe becoming governor that led to the woman coming forward. and nobody knows where this will go. and to your point, abortion and socialism, two things that really resonate, the president hit on something in the state of the union regarding that. but let s talk about the shutdown, another deadl
the senate republicans on the judicial committee gave her her voice. come to washington to testify. the democrats sat on this information, sat on that letter. they re the ones who made her a household name. they re the ones who caused her in front of the whole world to become a household name and be recognizable now. president trump finds her credible. does that mean he finds her believable? credible and compelling. judge kavanaugh said something under oath, they both could be rig right, that something truly happened to her in the summer of 1982 and judge kavanaugh with ans not involved. it s simply possible that her memory is faulty. it s also possible that his memory is faulty. do you believe that somebody who drinks a lot has never, ever had a memory loss the next day, not even a short one. you re asking me a general question about drinking and blacking out.
that the enlisted members be in it or not in it by simply being silent, because ultimately, you will put the officers on the panel. now, when you are selecting the jury, you do it in the same way of the military law as civilian law, and you can vet all of the panel members and determine whether or not they have prejudice against him and whether or not they have been poisoned by the information out there. or softened by that podcast, woe is me podcast that has been released? right. and that is for the prosecution to determine as well. two-sided process. could you ask that podcast to be suppress and not played in court. and they will, because obviously, the way it is seen are from the prosecution angle is that it is going to be self-serving statements, all rig right, and not taken under oath, and yes, they will avoid those coming in for sure. so many questions, but clearly, we are beginning the process. he did not enter the plea, and i suppose not too surprising, but it is comi