designed to waste huge amounts of my time i will personally hand curve her and escort her from the building. had you got form, mr cummings, for. studio: apologies for some of the languages used. this is a live stream of the uk covid inquiry and we are seeing messages containing course language. language. we cannot keep dealing with this horrific meltdown. page 10 of 283282. we have to get helen out of here. he is trying to get spads fired. can we get her in monday for her chat to her moving. we need her out asap. building millions of lovely houses. studio: again apologies for the language being used in this live stream. we will see a way in which you speak of a professional scientist who gave his time, and considerable amounts of energy to sage. professor neil ferguson, a third of the way down, we should get someone to hammer ferguson. mr cummings. was that aggressive and foul mouthed an misogynistic approach the correct wray to manage fellow professionals? i approach the cor
They weren t therefore following them, and now in retrospect it is clear they were breaking them? rfrgets i think it is clear that at the time they had broken the rule, the time they had broken the rule, the rules were constantly changing, they were quite complex, on the other hand the whole of the nation did stick to those. we were rigorous in the office and constituency we stuck to those and the prime minister must now i think apologise to parliament, but as i say, i think looking at the bigger picture, as to whether the prime minister should resign now or not, one has to look at that picture and say when i have thousands of constituents who are suffering the biggest squeeze on their incomes for a generation, when we are in the middle of the most bloody war since the second world war and when the imf is saying that the world economy is likely to slow down and difficult economic decisions have to be taken, what is in the country s greater interest? for the prime minister to resign, or