Panel. Hairing this basically keeping everybody more or less on time although we are starting a little bit late. So i just want to introduce our panelists and the weight will get started. I think we will go in the order. Isted in your program weo this panel is on are going to so, this panel is on radio and National Heritage and we are going to hear first from jane gilden and a member of npr who will talk about how they created the npr historical archive. Good morning, everybody. This is jane, my colleague. We are from the Research Archive and Data Strategy team at the National Public radio. We are known as rad. In our company. Several of our colleagues are also in attendance in the conference, so please make sure and introduce ourselves to them and say hi to them. Our chief officer sitting in the atnt will also be presenting the interdisciplinary session, so please make sure you attend her talk as well. We are here to tell you about historicalted nprs archive in 2013 from scratch while
Or less on time although we are starting a little bit late. So i just want to introduce our panelists and then we will get started. I think we will go in the order listed in your program. So, this panel is on radio and national heritage. And we are going to hear first from jane gilvin and ayda pourasad, of npr who will talk about how they created the npr Historical Archives. Ayda pourasad good morning, everybody. This is jane, my colleague. We are from the Research Archive and Data Strategy team at the National Public radio. We are known as rad. In our company. Several of our colleagues are also in attendance in the conference, so please make sure to go and introduce ourselves to them and say hi to them. Our chief officer sitting in the front will also be presenting at tomorrow at the Plenary Session so please make sure you attend , her talk as well. We are here to tell you about how we created nprs Historical Archive in 2013 from scratch while we were during the move to a new building
And were going to continue our discussion today by reviewing the works of Friedrich Hayek John Maynard Keynes and Milton Friedman whom i consider to be the three most influential economists of the 20th century and of the three, i really consider hayek to be the most influential. He addressed what i call the Knowledge Problem and this seems to me to be perhaps the most important contribution to economics since the time of adam smith. And this is what hayek had to say. About knowledge he said in economics, theres a problem of the division of knowledge. Which is quite analogous, too. And at least as important as the problem of the division of labor put forward by adam smith. But while the latter has been one of the main subjects of investigation ever since the beginning of our science. The former has been as completely neglected. Although it seems to me to be the really central problem of economics. As a social science the problem we pretend to solve is how the spontaneous interaction of
Discussion today by reviewing the works of Friedrich Hayek John Maynard Keynes and Milton Friedman whom i consider to be the three most influential economists of the 20th century and of the three, i really consider hayek to be the most influential. He addressed what i call the Knowledge Problem and this seems to me to be perhaps the most important contribution to economics since the time of adam smith. And this is what hayek had to say. About knowledge he said in economics, theres a problem of the division of knowledge. Which is quite analogous, too. And at least as important as the problem of the division of labor put forward by adam smith. But while the latter has been one of the main subjects of investigation ever since the beginning of our science. The former has been as completely neglected. Although it seems to me to be the really central problem of economics. As a social science the problem we pretend to solve is how the spontaneous interaction of a number of people each only po
To me to be perhaps the most important contribution to economics since the time of adam smith. And this is what hayek had to say. About knowledge he said in economics, theres a problem of the division of knowledge. Which is quite analogous, too. And at least as important as the problem of the division of labor put forward by adam smith. But while the latter has been one of the main subjects of investigation ever since the beginning of our science. The former has been as completely neglected. Although it seems to me to be the really central problem of economics. As a social science the problem we pretend to solve is how the spontaneous interaction of a number of people each only possessing bits of knowledge. Bring about a state of affairs that corresponds to equilibrium. How can we determine what Economic Production should be when knowledge is divided among all of the millions and tens of millions hundreds of millions billions of people in the world. How do we accommodate divided knowle