backroom deals, that s where the lot of people thought, but i ll tell you as respect to where the stadium is and where they moved. it is in my district, senate district six. and i m a democrat. and i represent that district. and also where the stadium is, it s represented by democratic representatives, so in terms of the area, where the stadium is, and where a lot of the folks that work at the stadium live, where democrats. cobb county is a blue county. while there may have been some thought that they were moving there because it was considered more conservative at some point in time, that s just not the case now. let s talk a little bit about voting rights in your, state they ve been under attack by republicans in, georgia new laws have been enacted, making it harder for people of color to, vote as a candidate for state attorney general, what can you do to protect voting, rights and make sure elections are free and fair. it really came down last time to maybe a handful of officials,
forward before the new administration and mexico kicks in early december. knowing full well that any preliminary agreement that the u.s. has reached with mexico could very well be up ended by the new president-elect in mexico. but at the same time, the problem with the president, as usual, he thinks he can get his way by trying to bully close u.s. allies into submission. and it is not entirely clear that canada is going to go along with the president s threats. in fact, at the movemement, it s like there is, again, another prospect of escalating tariffs and potential global trade war. anita, i have a two-part question for you. picking up on sabrina s point are there domestic political considerations that should weigh in on the president with the mid terms that could change how he negotiates with canada or mexico? sure. i mean, definitely. you ll see that s why we re seeing some pushback by republicans in on capitol hill. they re hearing at home in certain states that the farmer
after the politicians you like. that is the lesson. but when one of your campaign slogans was lock her up you for have to view this with a little healthy skepticism, and the idea that he is going after a political opponent after he won, it s disturbing. let s just be clear, because i think you raised the right point, which is, you know, can we should we be mad the fbi if they legitimately believe there is something there? sure. here s the thing, the fbi looks into hundreds of things all the time. right. they don t go out and confirm them publicly. they don t engage the house republicans in, you know, potential collaborative hearings. they don t talk to the attorney general s office. this is clearly a political operation. unless it s the steele dossier, in which case they do. i want to bring something else up. today a source close to the white house told me that steve bannon had been aware that a white house lawyer misled president trump about his authority to fire
trillion of subsidy costs for obama care. we currently can t afford the government we have, yet a trillion in new liabilities? the issue here is the larger program of obama care. when you look at rick scott and chris christie they ll take bits and piece toss help their individual states. i get that, but the larger program will financially implode until its own weight. that s just an economy reality. well, what kind of positioner these republicans in, who are, you know, rick scott, given the example he just decided he couldn t say no to that amount of money. do you think it s a situation where it s a year or two from now where we ll be litigating this against? republicans will never not litigating this. they ve not come to terms with the fact that it is the law of the land. in terms of how it will explode the deficit, put aside the fact that analysis have shown it will
starts right now. good evening. good evening, everybody. thank you for staying with us this hour. there was this moment in 2008 on election night that year. i know you were watching our coverage here on msnbc, but on election night in 2008 over on the fox news channel, carl rove in the middle of fox s election night coverage was on tv gaming out john mccain s chances of pulling out a win that night. he said during their election coverage, quote, if senator mccain loses ohio he goes from 286 electoral votes, which the republicans carried in 04, down to 266 and that puts him below the 270 needed to win the white house. he d not only need to sweep the rest of the states, which were won by republicans in 04, he d need to pick up something as well. at that exact moment as carl was saying on fox news as part of