It is not right. They want to go to france. They want to go to determine germany, go to the uk where they came from. That is hair home. U. S. Is not their home. It is not fair were holding these people and that other countries arent taking because were bearing the cost. So i think that nato should be expanded. We should include the middle east, absolutely. We pay for a big percentage of nato. By the way, if you look at, speak to secretarygeneral stoltenberg, who is doing a terrific job by the way, he will tell you that i raised 130 billion more than they were getting. It was going down from past administrations every single year. It was down to a very low number. I came in. Got to pay folks, got to pay. Were working with you. Were protecting you. Were part of this. We dont want to be the fools like weve been some years. We raised 130 billion almost immediately. We had a meeting with the countries say you got to pay. I imagine they dont like me as much as obama and other people but you
And the implications on the vote. We begin with Majority Leader Mitch Mcconnell. What we gistjust saw is pretty shocking. There are always limits to what could be accomplished when the American People chose divided government. but of course it doesnt mean washington shouldnt work toward Bipartisan Solutions that make sense for our country. Trade offers a perfect opportunity to do just that. We believe in lifting up the middle class and knocking down unfair barriers that discriminate against American Workers and products in the 21st century. On this issue the president agrees. We worked in good faith all year long to formulate a package both parties could support. The Top Republican on the finance committee, senator hatch, engaged in several months of negotiation with senator wyden. They talked with chairman ryan consulted with president obama, with democrats, with republicans, the issues they had to work through were tough. Difficult concessions had to be made. Many believed an agreeme
Cavuto. Man, oh, man, theyve got things going on across the country off the jersey shore, one planned on labor day off the coast of florida. Celebrating and protesting all at the same time this great country. Lets first go to david spunt at the white house on how the president and officials there are handling right now the controversy over a Magazine Article and no reporting on an employmenting surge. To you, sir. Reporter neil, good morning. That atlantic article all the rage here at 1600 pennsylvania avenue. The white house, when donald trump was a real estate mogul in new york, he always bragged and talked about the positive relationships he had with many people in the media, complaining though about the way the media has covered him since he became president of the United States almost four years ago. Now, case in point, we talked a little bit about those jobs numbers. The president , though, held a News Conference yesterday at the white house. From the moment he walked out, he tal
From Cyber Attacks. The president issuing an executive order to help america fight back against attackers. Does the plan go far enough . Michael chertoff joins us with more. Lori is hiking the minimum wage a problem . Fighting back against president obamas plan to raise the minimum wage by 1. 25 per hour. Melissa postmaster general warning it may need 45 billion bailout if congress doesnt act now. Oh, boy. Lori oh, boy. Stocks now as we do every 15 minutes. Lets check in with Nicole Petallides. The dow pulling back after yesterdays record high. Nicole that is right. We are off of lower lows of the day, but yesterday closed with a record high close that we havent seen since 2007. We have been hovering around 14,000 mark for the Dow Jones Industrial average. The bank index and drug index or lower although one of the names doing well in the Dow Jones Industrial. The banks doing very well. Last friday is where we broke out and started this trend. Yesterday we continued, today pulling back
Administration never expected to be the same position of allies around the world accusing it of illegal activity frankly needs to go to the same effort now and the rules would be to say its not to stare at the treaty. This is too difficult to negotiate a treaty, but to agree on legal principles such as a country can use lethal force against a terrorist in another country whose threat and attack if that country is unwilling or unable to prevent that thread. In most cases around the world, the countries are able to prevent that thread. They can arrest the person. But in four or five countries, yemen, somalia, pakistan want to get countries around the world to acknowledge the United States right under International Law to use force to kill someone in another country who is posing a threat when it cant be addressed in another way. We can get there, but theyre just not going to agree to our position unless we go through Aggressive International legal diplomacy. Its a great kind of questions