Sor. here to serve. And i am deeply sor. i z here to serve. And i am deeply sor. z z sorry. The 1700 Page Report comes seven sorry. The 1700 Page Report comes seven years sorry. The 1700 Page Report comes seven years after sorry. The 1700 Page Report| comes seven years after the fire took the lives of 72 people. Families have said that they were failed by dishonesty. We paid the price of Systematic Dishonesty, institutional indifference and neglect. It was the worst disaster of its kind in modern british history. Disaster the final part of the official inquiry into the blaze has been published. It concludes that the Fire Injune 2017 was the result of a chain of failures by successive governments, by the Systematic Dishonesty of Cladding And Insulation companies and by a lack of strategy by the Fire Service. 72 people lost their lives. The inquiry concludes that the deaths were all avoidable. Speaking in parliament, prime Minister Keir Starmer to ensure similarfire tragedies cannot occu
These are some of their faces, and today victims and campaigners say those involved in the cover up over what happened, should hang their heads in shame. Hugh pym reports, on the conclusions, of a landmark hearing. 0n on day one of the inquiry, supported by family giving evidence. Is a on day one of the inquiry, supported by family giving evidence. By family giving evidence. Is a huge im act on by family giving evidence. Is a huge impact on family by family giving evidence. Is a huge impact on family because. By family giving evidence. Is a huge impact on family because. He by family giving evidence. Is a huge impact on family because. He did| impact on family because. He did not survive impact on family because. He did not survive long impact on family because. He did not survive long enough impact on family because. He did not survive long enough to impact on family because. He did not survive long enough to see not survive long enough to see todays report. He was infected with hiv a
Consensus reached after multiple days and meetings among officials. We reviewed Department Policies and concluded Assistant Director pre steps exercise of description in opening the investigation was in compliance with those policies. We also reviewed, as we detail in the report, the emails, Text Messages and other documents of those involved in that decision, particularly mr. Pre steps. We didnt find documentary or Testimonial Evidence that indicated political bias or improper motivation influencing his decision to open the investigation. While the information in the fbis possession at the time was limited, in light of the Throw Threshold established by department and fbi predication policy which, by the way, is not a legal requirement but a prudential one in the fbi and Department Policies, we found that Crossfire Hurricane was opened for an authorized
investigative purpose and with sufficient factual predication. This decision to open Crossfire Hurricane which involved the activitie
uncharacterist uncharacteristic, flowery, heated opening. fisa court identified 25 cases in which it was misled by the fbi. internal fbi of 2006 dozens of inaccuracies provided by. fisa court. let s have a fullsome conversation about this about the future of the fi sachlt court and representations made to it. senator durbin basically accusing republicans of cherry picking this. trump allies are using some of these issues to try to muddy the waters on the broader conclusions. take attorney general barr, saying he has his own view that the evidence was insufficient to open the probe, but that contradicts what this whole process was about and what the report found. meanwhile u.s. attorney durham releasing this rare and potentially misleading statement that he just doesn t agree with some of the reports conclusions. today, lawmakers asked about that very disagreement. take a look. did attorney general barr
none of the discussions changed our findings. tasked by attorney general barr to also investigate the origins of the russia investigation stated and i quote, last month, we advised the ig that we do not agree with some of the reports conclusions as to predication and how the fbi case was open. what s your reaction to that? i was surprised by the statement that i didn t know was going to be released on monday. we did meet with mr. durham as i mentioned. we provided him with a copy of the report as we did others through our factual accuracy review process. we met with him in november with regard to that. we did discuss the opening.