Stay updated with breaking news from Reliance centers. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
The best choice for them and their family. thank you. justice barrett? i have a followup to the question about reliance. i m trying to nail down. and i asked this question, but i m not sure i fully understand the rickelman the question too, but i m not sure i fully understand the position. on pages 18 and 19 of your brief, you talk about relicense reliance interest. and i mentioned the safe haven laws, and it seems to me i fully understand the reliance centers, and then there are the more specific ones about a woman s access to abortion as a back up form of birth control in the event that contraception fails but what do you have to say to petitioner s argument that the reliance interest dos not ....
0 standard of self-has proved difficult to administer and that is relevant to the analysis. and i want to give you an opportunity to respond. yes, your honor. the first point i d like to make is the undue burden test is not at issue in this case. that is the test that applies to regulations, not prohibitions. and the state has conceded that this is a prohibition. that s the title of this law. an act to prohibit abortion after 15 weeks. the only thing at issue in this case is the viability line, and the viability line has been enduringly workable. the lower federal courts have applied it consistently and uniformly for 50 years, and the fifth circuit here below had no difficulty striking down this law unanimously, 3 -0. it s been an exceedingly workable standard. if i may return to your question, sir chief justice, a reasonable possibility standard would not be workable. it would ultimately boil down to an argument that states can prohibit a category of women from exercising the consti ....