Stay updated with breaking news from Recontacted the. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
The redactions here. it starts to look like this. but even with the redactions, you can still get the basics of this sort of five-part list of things that they say they re lying about. mueller s office says manafort lied to them about his interactions with konstantin kilimnik. remember that name? kilimnik was sort of manafort s right-hand man in his business in ukraine, and prosecutors have already said in other court filings that they believe konstantin kilimnik is associated with the interactions. lying about the fact and frequency of what appear to be his interaction was kilimnik. but again, there are a whole bunch of redactions there. then there is an intriguing subheading in this part of the filing where mueller s office also said manafort lied about his knowledge of what appears to be somebody else meeting with kilimnik. see that line there next to the bullet point? redacted, redacted, recontacted the, meeting with kilimnik that name is blacked out. there is open source reporting ....
Filing where mueller s office also said manafort lied about his knowledge of what appears to be somebody else meeting with kilimnik. see that line there next to the bullet point? redacted, redacted, recontacted the, meeting with kilimnik that name is blacked out. there is open source reporting that has sort of followed the saga of paul manafort and konstantin kilimnik and how manafort s business entanglements and russian entanglements followed him into his involvement in the trump campaign. because of that open source reporting, it seems possible that one of the things that could be behind the redactions here could be related to manafort s knowledge of a meeting that allegedly happened during the presidential campaign between manafort s own right-hand man kilimnik and this russian oligarch named oleg deripaska. russian oligarch to whom manafort reportedly owed money, and to whom manafort reportedly offered private briefings about the campaign while he was still trump s campaign chair. ....
This sort of five-part list of things that they say they re lying about. mueller s office says manafort lied to them about his interactions with konstantin kilimnik. remember that name? kilimnik was sort of manafort s right-hand man in his business in ukraine, and prosecutors have already said in other court filings that they believe con importa konstantin kilimnik has been lying. lying about the fact and frequency of what appear to be his interaction was kilimnik. but again, there are a whole bunch of redactions there. then there is an intriguing subheading in this part of the filing where mueller s office also said manafort lied about his knowledge of what appears to be somebody else meeting with kilimnik. see that line there next to the bullet point? redacted, redacted, recontacted the, meeting with kilimnik that name is blacked out. there is open source reporting that has sort of followed the saga of paul manafort and konstantin kilimnik and how manafort s business ....
Tomorrow s court filings in the case of both michael cone and paul manafort? tomorrow will be a busy day, wolf. we re all anxiously awaiting to see what exactly the special counsel says in terms of revealing more information about the alleged lies that manafort told and what he did to undo his plea deal. we ll see how much they reveal and don t reveal. and even if some of their filings are recontacted the, once again, as they did with the former national security adviser earlier this week with michael flynn, anything that is blacked out eventually we will see. so when it comes to michael cohen on that issue, anything that they do in terms of detailing some of his cooperation, that will be interesting because all of that will eventually be unsealed once these investigations wrap up. chris you think we could see some damaging information involving the president? always possible. you know, i think laura makes the point that if the flynn sentencing document is indicative at all, we r ....
Would look if it was just here. the mustache down to the jaw line. rachel, you re never going to know! but listen, let s get back to the story you broke earlier in the hour, the fusion gps story. yeah. here it is, they re just asking for full transparency about what they have worked on and what they have revealed to the committee. yeah. and we ve sort of knew that was going to be an issue. because the first time that glen simpson from fusion testified, it was 10 hours before the senate judiciary committee. and his lawyer put out a statement after that saying this transcript is the property of the committee. we expect that they may release it. chuck grassley was then asked at an iowa town hall by a constituent, it s your committee. will you vote to release that transcript? he said yes, essentially after we clean it up and make sure nothing needs to be recontacted the. the redaction process was complete. so it s in grassley s hands if he wants to hold a vote to release that thing ....