very heavy price other than this nonconventional kind of rebellion-type fighting that he s going to see coming up, which will happen by the way, they need weapons to fight back against their missile brigades, against this really long-rage artillery. they needed more sophisticated weapons. they ve been asking for them. they haven t quite been getting them. my argument is if you want to tell putin that this is going to be really costly to you, we re going to give the ukrainians everything that they need to fight against your technical army that s amassing on that border, and the administration just hasn t done it. here s a couple things he s going to factor it unfortunately. when they took swift, which was the access to international money change, you know, banking system, when te took that off the table for sanctions, that was a huge relief to putin. and so he knows that there won t be direct military action. he knows that the swift won t be a part of it if he invades. all of these thin
membership or not. how do you think the biden administration is dealing with this less than six months after the afghanistan withdrawal, we re talking about having a presence somewhere else again. what do you think the biden administration is doing about this? good job or bad? you know, mediocre best, and i don t say that lightly. diplomacy is really the only option you have at this point. but one of the things i think they swung and missed and they did this the last go around in ukraine, by the way, when so many of their national security people were there is that the ukrainians were saying, let us fight against this high-tech weaponry that we know the russians are amassing on our border, and it s been trickling in. if you wanted to send a message that putin is going to pay a very heavy price other than this non-conventional rebellion-type fighting that he s going to see coming up, which will happen, by the way, they needed a weapon to fight back against their missile brigades.