Real Intel News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana
Stay updated with breaking news from Real intel. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Top News In Real Intel Today - Breaking & Trending Today
The biden administration is on this and will hold china accountable? well, i have no confidence that they re going to hold china accountable. we don t have to look any further than the first 100 days in office to see they re more in appeasement mode than attack mode. i can say this. when you listen to the reporting that just came out with the way that they re describing the reason why they shut this down, it s just mind boggling to suggest that someone at the biden state department wants to shut something down in order to protect donald trump? i mean, it defies logic. no one with common sense would believe that that is the reason why they re doing it. it s not based on junk science. it s based on real intel. we need to get to the bottom of it. it doesn t take 90 days to do it. it takes a tough administration at 1600 pennsylvania avenue and we have not seen that yet. martha: as far as the funding that took place, there s an ....
As i read that, it s the government, we may not have other people we would be bringing to trial or because of manafort s shady history with lying, we may not be able to put him on the stand, this is something that has valuable information about russia, about the ukraine, and i think they saw him as a potential source of real intel. based on your reading, your experience as a fid. do you think it s really possible that manafort had reason or has reason to fear for his safety or the members of his family? he may. at this point, manafort is in jail right now, so the prisons do a pretty good job of protecting his safety. but certainly there is the safety of his family out there. this is something the government deals with all the time. he s not unique in the sense that he would have a security threat. we re very used to having to protect people that are cooperating witnesses. and they have ways of doing that ....
Government, we may not have other people we would be bringing to trial or because of manafort s shady history with lying, we may not be able to put him on the stand, but this is somebody that has valuable information about russia, about the ukraine, and i think they saw him as a potential source of real intel. based on your reading, your experience as a fed, all of it, do you think it s really possible that manafort had reason or has reason to fear for his safety or the members of his family? he may. at this point, manafort is in jail right now, so the prisons do a pretty good job of protecting his safety. but certainly there is the safety of his family out there. this is something the government deals with all the time. he s not unique in the sense that he would have a security threat. we re very used to having to protect people that are cooperating witnesses. and they certainly have ways of doing that if, in fact, it s a real threat. michael schmidt, one of the larger stories y ....
Traditional cooperating witness, they were intrigued by the intelligence value manafort could offer. as i read that, it s the government, we may not have other people we would be bringing to trial or because of manafort s shady history with lying, we may not be able to put him on the stand, this is something that has valuable information about russia, about the ukraine, and i think they saw him as a potential source of real intel. based on your reading, your experience as a fid. do you think it s really possible that manafort had reason or has reason to fear for his safety or the members of his family? he may. at this point, manafort is in jail right now, so the prisons do a pretty good job of protecting his safety. but certainly there is the safety of his family out there. this is something the government deals with all the time. he s not unique in the sense that he would have a security threat. we re very used to having to protect people that are cooperating witnesses. ....
Asked the question. is that his last name? i don t know. and he admitted he delayed chawlg it a terrorist t theng it a terrorist act debate. the explaination he gave to this fellow was he delayed to make sure he was acting on real intel that was a good answer. he could have used it in the debate. that makes no sense to me. why do that when you can demigog. give him a break when it comes to that issue. really? well, let s find out the facts before we move forward. i agree. he should have said that. he should have said that. that s exactly right. they pushed that story line so hard. that was one of the most annoying parts about candy s interruption. for two weeks they were really forcing it down your throat. this is about the youtube video, the youtube video. they wouldn t stop. they said, can that really be ....