And he wasnt answering it in the hall, either. Instead, this was defiant and a vow for hezbollah s backers. I have a message for the tyrants of tehran, if you strike us, we will strike you. There is no place in iran that the long arm of Israel Cannot reach, and that is true of the entire Middle East. Watching were some relatives of israeli hostages held in gaza. Mr netanyahu didnt mention diplomacy, saying only, surrender by hamas would be enough to stop israels offensive. And he made no mention of the us call for a truce with lebanon, instead saying Hezbollah Rocket Fire had to stop. Yet israel has been tolerating this intolerable situation for nearly a year. Well, ive come here today to say enough is enough chanting palestine will be free and where Mr Netanyahu goes, so does dissent against israels military offensives. Now lebanese flags join the palestinian ones. They accuse the us of keeping the weapons flowing to israel, despite Mr Netanyahu ignoring much of what america has wante
waste of time and a red herring. he also said loud and clear that his old boss brought this on himself by taking what did not belong to him, refusing to give it back and he seemed to suggest perhaps obstructing justice with his legal team deceiving investigators. i think the driver on this from the beginning was, you know, loads of classified information sitting in mar-a-lago. people say this was unprecedented. it s also unprecedented for a president to take all this classified information and put them in a country club, okay? and how long is the government going to try to get that back? they jawbone for a year. they were deceived on the voluntary actions taken. they then went and got a subpoena. they were deceived on that. they feel. and the facts are starting to show that they were being jerked around. and so how long you know, how long do they wait? the answer, as we now know, was more than a year before seeking a search warrant. the former attorney general had more
purpose. yes, she hinted strongly that she is ready to evolve away from tennis, in that vogue article she wrote, but since then, in a few of the press conferences we have heard, she said, let s see what happens. i still have something. certainly, if she were to win, you have to think that it would make her think again about stepping away, but among the fans i spoke with who said yes, we believe she can win, i will follow her lead and take a game by game, day by day. no real clarity, but, i believe a big win would mix up the calculation, a little bit. whatever it is, it will be on her terms. so glad you are there, thank you. joining us is william c roden, writer at large and a sports columnist for the new york times. it s an honor to meet you. what is your reaction to the match, so far? oh man. this is so wonderful. i have a house full of people. it reminds me of what my father
i think we ve long been g concerned about china s growing influence around the world. the chinese continued to try to bully and intimidate their way into pursuing their own selfish national security interests at the expense of of populations all around the world. wh mr. secretary, which is that we re not trying to contain china and now we re very worried about china s expansion. t ch the liket s that shrug your shoulders foreign policy. i don t know, laura . the chinese communist party presents the single greatest external risk tote the united states of america from any place in the worldd d a wes. call it what exactly it wa. it was w an adversary of the united states of america.k this administration kind of a walked that back and said, well, we kind of ch compete with them. om no, wepe compete with norway. we compete with sweden. the chinese communist party is trying to take down western democracy here at home a lot ofre makingcrac progress. we need real resolve, real clarity, a s
concerned about china s growing influence around the world. the chinese continue to try to bully and intimidate their way into pursuing their own selfish national security interests at the expense of populations all around the world. laura: mr. secretary, which is it? we are not trying to contain china but we are very worried about china s expansion? i mean, it is like the shrug your shoulders foreign policy, i don t know. yeah, laura, the chinese communist party presents the single greatest external risk to the united states of america from any place in the world. we called it what exactly it was. it was an adversary of the united states of america. this administration kind of walk that back and said welcome we try to compete with them no, we compete with norway, we compete with sweden. the chinese communist party is time to take down western democracy here at home and they are making a lot of progress. we need real result, real clarity, a strong posture and build friends, india