this by the federal courts. alabama is refusing to do it. even though alabama technically is a state in the united states of america which is a country that is technically subject to the rulings of the supreme court of the united states. even the alabama parts of the united states are subject to federal court orders. but apparently they are deciding on this issue that they maybe don t want to be. so we re going to talk about this more in detail a little later on in the show tonight, with someone who s right in the middle of this fight, but alabama deciding it just might not follow federal court orders when it comes to black people voting in 2023. it s not like a, you know, a rascally little tantrum that alabama is throwing here. this is the whole point o. of the country kind of stuff. this is as serious as it gets. defying federal court orders, that is a fast drive down a
alabama is refusing to do it. even though alabama technically is a state in the united states of america which is a country i that is technically subject to the rulings of the supreme couri of the united states. even the alabama parts of the united states are subject to s federal court orders. but apparently they are deciding on this issue that they maybe don t want to be. so we re going to talk about this more in detail a little ng later on in the show tonight, with someone who s right in the middle of this fight, but alabama deciding it just might not follow federal court orders when it comes to black people s voting in 2023. it s not like a, you know, a rascally little tantrum that alabama is throwing here. this is 24 whole point of the country kind of stuff. this is as serious as it gets. defying federal court orders, that is a fast drive down a short road for any country. any state in the deep south, any state that say seceded during the civil war is very very well
year everything has had to be dried. what does that do for your bottom line? it what does that do for your bottom line? , ., ., ., ., ,., ., line? it is not good for the bottom line, but it line? it is not good for the bottom line, but it is line? it is not good for the bottom line, but it is something line? it is not good for the bottom line, but it is something we - line? it is not good for the bottom line, but it is something we have i line? it is not good for the bottom l line, but it is something we have to contend with and cope with that cost. it contend with and cope with that cost. , ., , ., ., , ., , cost. it is not ust arable farmers who have cost. it is notjust arable farmers who have been cost. it is notjust arable farmers who have been affected - cost. it is notjust arable farmers who have been affected by - cost. it is notjust arable farmers who have been affected by the i cost. it is notjust arable farmers i who have been affected by the rain. this is a fairly r
in congress. for the past year, the oce had been investigating congressman duncan hunter, that s him vaping during a congressional hearing, for misuse of campaign funds. the investigation into congressman hunter s alleged misuse of funds has been public for some time now but thanks to a comment made by his office in response to questions about the oce, we now know that one of the things representative hunter was specifically being investigated for was spending $600 of his campaign s money on in cabin rabbit transport fees. in other words, the congressman spent $600 in campaign donations on airfare for his family s pet rabbit. rascally. now a spokesperson for representative hunter s office told a local paper that the $600 rabbit ride was mistakenly charged to his campaign account and that might be true. but how to explain some other expenses that the oce as well as the federal elections commission have been investigating? expenses like $1,300 in steam
congressman hunter s alleged misuse of funds has been public for some time now but thanks to a comment made by his office in response to questions about the oce, we now know that one of the things representative hunter was specifically being investigated for was spending $600 of his campaign s money on in cabin rabbit transport fees. in other words, the congressman spent $600 in campaign donations on airfare for his family s pet rabbit. rascally. now a spokesperson for representative hunter s office told a local paper that the $600 rabbit ride was mistakenly charged to his campaign account and that might be true. but how to explain some other expenses that the oce as well as the federal elections commission have been investigating? expenses like $1,300 in steam video games spent over the course of two months. another alleged mistake his office blamed on his teenaged son. or how about nearly $300 in food from jack-in-the-box. also a mistake.