between people who are willing to use the power of the state to silence their opponent, and those who are unwilling. what s the hill this country together since the civil war? it s not that of a federal code, it s not even the bill of rights come as important is. remember, the soviet union had a bill of rights for guaranteed freedom of speech and equal rights. but in practice the bolsheviks sent their dissidents to the gulags. as he boasted, show me the man, i will show you the crime. now what s kept us functioning through the centuries where the bolsheviks failed is that our constitution separated powers and prevented a unit party. we also had an understanding that state power shall not be used for improper political purposes. the law must be enforced equally, without political considerations. and once you lose that common understanding, it s mutually assured destruction. nobody had any reason to uphold the system, so the system will collapse. the late anthony scalia made th
supervisor and special agent and he joins us now. thank you for being with us. in that montage, you heard a lot about the rule of law over partisan politics. therefore, i should assume there is a raid coming. for eric swalwell and hunter biden. right? the rule of law is not a bumper sticker. i know that seems to be applied on everything today because people are gleeful that a person or political figure that they dislike is getting what they believe he has coming to them. the problem is, which you laid out at the top of the show, disparate treatment. start with general flynn, the fact that the logan act was employed. enacted in 1799, never been prosecuted. yet the fbi and doj considered it. they get to play to 1,001. that is lying to an fbi agent. 25 years and the fbi and i tell you this, i pleaded with u.s. attorneys to allow us to charge people for lying to the fbi.
imprisonment, negligent discharge of a firearm, those are the types of people they are looking at. and, again, foreign the life of me, i do not understand why these laws are good for the state of california. i just it s mind boggling to me. that s why these polls show that the regular people, the people whose lives are endangered are the ones most against these policies. now a private employer, for instance, private business owner is prohibited by state law from basically reporting someone hot feds or that s crazy. but you are wrong there, laura. what the state law requires an employer to do is to notify their workforce that ice is going to be doing a review. what s happening here. laura: what is that doing? that employer is turning into enforcement agent when all that employer wants to do is grow their business and make sure that they and their family are going to succeed. why are we asking an employer to take on immigration enforcement? laura: why are you telling an employe
imprisonment, negligent discharge of a firearm, those are the types of people they are looking at. and, again, foreign the life of me, i do not understand why these laws are good for the state of california. i just it s mind boggling to me. that s why these polls show that the regular people, the people whose lives are endangered are the ones most against these policies. now a private employer, for instance, private business owner is prohibited by state law from basically reporting someone hot feds or that s crazy. but you are wrong there, laura. what the state law requires an employer to do is to notify their workforce that ice is going to be doing a review. what s happening here. laura: what is that doing? that employer is turning into enforcement agent when all that employer wants to do is grow their business and make sure that they and their family are going to succeed. why are we asking an employer to take on immigration enforcement? laura: why are you telling an employe