Since the AO did not consider that assessee has incurred expenses as per the terms & conditions of the agreement, the Mumbai ITAT directed the AO to allow the claim of the assessee to treat Form.
The Bombay High Court has directed the disciplinary action against AO as no order has been passed on the rectification application filed by the assessee for six years.The bench of Justice K. R..
The Bombay High Court single bench of Justice R I Chagla held that the arbitral tribunal has the power to decide whether the non-signatory is bound by the Arbitration Agreement and to implead the.
The Bombay High Court at Goa has directed the department to accept the declaration under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 (VsV Act).The bench of Justice M. S. Sonak and Justice Valmiki Sa Menezes has.
The Mumbai Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that the assessee was an unsuspecting investor who transacted in a penny stock with a view to earning a quick profit, and since his.