American history tomorrow, opening arguments are set to begin in the first where he is facing dozens of charges related to film actress Stormy Daniels. Tonight, trump is lashing out at the judge, again, calling for the gag order to be removed. Ahead of a hearing on tuesday. Prosecutor said last week that trump had already violated that order seven times already. Lets get straight to cnns Marshall Cohen and joins me here on set. So marshall, tomorrow is going to be unprecedented in so many ways. What are you going to be looking out for . Well, i am not looking to see the judge take that gag quarter away. Right. We all know thats not going to happen. Thats just trump lashing out. He is allowed to attack the judge. He is allowed to attack the da, but he is not permitted to talk about the other prosecutors, the staff at the court. And importantly, the Family Members of the judge. So he is toeing the line. Theyre going against the judge saying playing playing within the rules and limitation
you still support him in november my choice is between joe biden and donald trump every single day of the week? yes, i will support donald trump alex, what do you make of that? that s how many republicans feel. look what would certainly much rather have the economy, the border and national security and public safety of the trump leadership, than the biden leadership that is without question. and look, the republican party, there s two subsets, basically, his rabbit base is fully on board with everything he says when he walks into the courtroom and out of the courtroom, this is weaponization of the doj. i m a victim. this is a witch-hunt. this is prosecutorial misconduct against biden s biggest threat that is what he feels he has a martyr in his supporters believe that then on the rational republicans that realize there s some there, there, there might be some questionable activity, but at the end of the day, they would much rather have his policies over biden s. but my dear friend ma
where trump seemed to suggest he could separate this process, we ll go with daca, that folks thought he was soft, he was going soft, going towards the democrats side, democratic side. here he is throwing a bone to his base this rabbit base. he suddenly comes out in some sophisticate way as hard on immigration in some ways scapegoating these nations. that s the first thing t. second thing is this, the immigration debate has always carried with it an undertone of racism. the immigration debate, no matter attributing this to everyone who holds the position, but there is a sense which immigration is driven by a deep anxiety of the browning of america. how will we stem the tide, that this is no longer a white nation. we need to understand, ever since the first naturalization act of 1790 which only allowed citizenship to free white people. it wasn t until 1952 that racial discrimination was not allowed for naturalization then we saw