infrastructure plan. we want t everyday americans, strengthen the affordable care ability. a trillion dollar infrastructure plan, it will create 16 million good paying jobs republicans, democrats, even the president has supported the notion that we have to fix our broken infrastructure. you didn t quite answer the question you haven t decided whether that will be a rule or not. we have not had that discussion in caucus we have discussed proceeding in a strongly bipartisan way on issues of importance to the american people. i want to have you see if you can respond to something that speaker pelosi said in response to the roger stone indictment. take a listen. excuse me, let me put it on screen in the face of 37 indictments, the president continued actions to undermine the special counsel investigation raised the question, what does putin have rhetorically on the president politically, financially? she asked that rhetorically. at what point do you think it s appropriate to begin th
as it was about her really saying she was sorry for what she did. last week she loved it and laughed at it and produced it. that s a problem. that s a bit unfair, ben. first of all in the teleprompter last week there wasn t racist or racial humor. what she asked was can someone caption the picture. we re beginning with the premises that was a bad idea but let s not say she went into the segment with the mindset of saying something offensive. once it starred people said things that were inappropriate and hurt feelings and she acknowledged it and apologized and there s absolutely no reason to think she was insincere or she was anything less than contrite. the question you were asked was this enough. the question you haven t answered. do you think it was enough? i think let me ask you this. do you think she should have been fired? i think there certainly should have been a leave of absence for some time at a bare minimum and i think the reality is this picture, the only reason w
justice system the way it works is, it is not like captain smith who went down with the titanic because he happened to be the captain that day. in order to criminally prosecute a upper level executive you have to have direct evidence or some type of evidence that he was knowingly involved or knew about what was going on and either fostered it or encouraged it. look at thing with steve cohen and sac capital. the feds have tried and tried and tried yet to indict him personally for a guy whose fingers were clearly on the pulse. the question you haven t seen number level people are not getting indicted because there isn t evidence directly tying them to criminal activity. just because five years have gone doesn t mean criminal charges can not be brought under a conspiracy theory. jenna: let s ask robert a little bit that because he worked on inside, connecting the dots, the top office to the trader on the floor is it just too challenging to connect the dots and at that point is there rea