i know this is popular t with some of them. will this help stem the tide of black voters who arere also t looking at alternatives other than the democrats? you know, i think they are just grasping at straws at t this point of bill surrounding discrimination around black hair. are you kidding me?diha i have never heard of a more ridiculous thing. and am i saying that people should be discriminated against baseded on their hair? b absolutely not.ut but it is is it a pervasive n problem that we need to be focusing our time or money and our resources on as a country? absolutely not. n and iec think it s because they re realizing that blackar voters are lookinge at the wordh that they re saying and it s not matching up to their actions to. ra sows again, they are grasping at straws trying to push this racist white supremacister narrative that they run with every single election cycle in hopes of gaining those votes back . and i don t think it s going to work now, said ari. arianna,a, what e
. well,, it all goes b back to donald trump. watch. i the first order issue i think is the one you re raising aboutw free speech, about what do youy on musk wants todo actually do with twitterwi? lots ofsp people speculating, fr example, that perhaps president trump would bemu back on an elon musk owned twitter. he really believes in a sort of laissez faire version or view. this raises question about information, misinformation, disinformation. and that s really that s if they re worried about they re worried about trump s influencee and the tattered state of the democrat party . obviouslyarty. absolutely. when the principal of laissezcu faire became kind of a curse word, it applied to economics. g the left was pushing for economic regulation. but even then aten t that time they weren t pushing foror regulating speech. i mean, whatever you think of facto he is the de leader of the oppositioncr party in a democratic give and take the idea that he doesn t
he went to shake the hand of someone who wasn t there and thenen he kind of does that. what s going on are of course bush would never allow his staff would never allow somethingldik like that to happ. it wouldn t happen. but where s the staff? why does this keep happening? well, let me let me try to be kind. as just j maybe he was justus gesticulatig with his hand . maybe it wasn t really in shaking but er i don t know but man laura he s lost his wandering lost on a stage president don t do that . you have crystal clear instructions you finish your turnleou you go out stage t stage right. he was told ahead of time there s usually a chart backstage that actually shows him physically with arrowsws. so he was lost he was lost on stage after giving speech and it s it s physically mentally sad to say now are
0 this evening. as always, thank you for beingel with you. op makee this show possible. we hope you ll say a dvr so you never miss an episode. i ll be out tomorrow. tammyut bruce will be and i hope you have a great passover and a great easter and never let your heart be troubled. thanks for being with us. er good evening, everyone.th i m laura ingraham and this is the ingraham angle. h tonight we bring you part two of our exclusive with mel gibson and mark wahlberg. you ll hear why they ve turned to making family themedily mov. plus their thoughts on a new trend among some men in hollywood. you don t want to miss it. but first, dems don t t care. that s the focus of tonight s angle. it almost seems vindictive at this point. now a a i m talking about what the party in power isn t inflicting on the united states runaway inflation, devastating family budgets now crime waves terrorizing our cities. the fentanyl explosion killing thousands of americans every month. millions of illegal