Stay updated with breaking news from Purple heart. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
there s a question of what point does amending a testimony become straight-up lying or perjuring one self? one said that the testimony of other witnesses helped to refresh their memories and see in new light their own experiences and will be instructive to see what volcker has to say for himself on the two key questions, quid pro quo, bribery plot, and what he was doing with rudy giuliani. his testimony was that he rudy giuliani as being a nuance and more helpful to bring rudy giuliani in and help him understand that he was promulgating the debunked conspiracy scenarios instead of freelance out there in ukraine. jeff bennett on capitol hill for us, thank you very much. joining us is democrat congressman jim himes from connecticut. congressman, your questioning of control knell vind man was one of the more emotional moments this morning. i wonder if you could look back to that for us this morning. yeah. well, it was a pretty tough moment for me. we had gotten word and sort ....
mr. eisenberg, he told me to take my concerns to him. and, there s a period of time in it wasn t that long a period of time, but it was enough time for me to enough time to talk to someone who you want i will assume it is, right? i ve been instructed not to, representative jordan. he s what i m getting. he told you not to talk to any of the people and you interpret that as not talking to your boss. but you talked to your brother, you talked to the lawyers, you talked to secretary kent, and the one guy adam schiff will let you tell us who he is. is that right? representative jordan, i did my job. i m not saying you didn t. all i m saying is the instructions from the lawyer where that you shouldn t talk to anybody, and you interpret that as don t talk to my boss, but i m gonna go talk to someone that we can t even ask you if that individual is. that is incorrect. i just read what you said. i shouldn t talk to any of the people. the time of the gentleman ....
with the findings in the horowitz report. horrow its seems to be giving the fbi that part of the investigation saying it s a clean bill. they had enough reason to do this investigation. everybody who was interviewed cements to indicate they did not open an investigation. evan perez, thank you so much. joining our panel now, we have with us jim bakker. you are not singled out the report makes clear the fbi failed when it came to the administering the fisa warrants, too much was left out or not presented to the court. do you accept what the inspector general is saying? i am there are two big groups of conclusions, one is, it was not a politically motivated investigation and it was properly predicated with us going-forward with that investigation. it was malpractice for us not to open this investigation. all of the statements that it was a hoax are wrong. the investigation was not a coup or a coup attempt. having said that, he does point out many mistakes that were made wit ....
charge. the truth is in the history of this republic, there s never been a single party fraudulent impeachment process deployed against a president like the one that s being used against donald trump. that s what s unprecedented here. it s not the claim that a president doesn t want to turn over witnesses or documents. that, as we ve said many times today, is actually quite common. and by the way, let s remember it needs to be noted again that president trump has consistently cooperated with this congress in fulfilling its oversight you are listening to one of the many hours of today s very historic house judiciary committee hearing on the articles of impeachment against president donald trump. our live continuing coverage will take place over this hour and further hours as needed. but we want to let you know how we re going to cover this. we re keeping an eye on this hearing. we have reason to believe there could be a vote on the current amendment soon. the committee s ob ....
elect the american president? the citizens of this country and no one else. men and women have died on the battlefield to protect our democracy. the least we can do is show the courage to stand up tonight and do our part, to protect our democracy. with that, i yield back. the gentleman yields back. does anyone else seek recognition on the amendment? armstrong. armstrong. for what purposes buzz mr. armstrong seek recognition? move to strike is the last word. and i m going to go back to the initial language of the amendment, and particularly the removal from office and disqualification to hold any office of honor, trust, or profit under the united states. so at numerous points in times during today s debate have they my friends on the other side of the aisle held up a pocket constitution, waved it around. i think it s interesting nobody has read from it yet, and i think there is a reason for that. but i m going to read from the constitution. and if we want to talk about Office , 25th-amendment , Language , Debate , Disqualification , Profit , Removal , Times , Honor , Trust , American , Points