/PRNewswire/ COURT-APPROVED LEGAL NOTICE If you purchased any Pork product in the United States from June 28, 2014, through June 30, 2018, a class action.
/PRNewswire/ COURT-APPROVED LEGAL NOTICE If you purchased any Pork product in the United States from January 1, 2009, through April 2, 2021, a class action.
/PRNewswire/ COURT-APPROVED LEGAL NOTICE If you purchased Boxed or Case-Ready Beef directly from Cargill, JBS, National Beef, or Tyson in the United States.
Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP and Gustafson Gluek PLLC Announce a $20 Million Settlement for Consumers Who Purchased Pork Products prnewswire.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from prnewswire.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Tech
your username
March 9, 2021
On Monday, the plaintiffs in a privacy suit against home security device provider Ring filed an opposition, in the Central District of California, to Ring’s motion to compel arbitration, claiming that “Ring seeks to avoid class liability or public accountability by forcing its customers into private arbitration.”
According to the opposition, Ring “sold home security devices riddled with deficient security protocols and privacy protections.” The plaintiffs alleged that “(h)ackers took advantage of these obvious deficiencies to gain unauthorized access to Plaintiffs’ Ring devices,” thus allowing the hackers to “invade( ) their homes and shout( ) profanities, obscenities, and death threats at them.” Meanwhile, “(o)thers suffered the loss of their personal identifying information (‘PII’), which Ring provided to third parties without their consent or authorization.”