Image issues and encouraging eating disorders. She says the social media platform put profits ahead of its users while being. profits ahead of its users while beinu. ~. ,. , ,. ,. While being. We want to protect children, it s while being. We want to protect children, it s that while being. We want to protect children, it s that simple while being. We want to protect children, it s that simple as children, it s that simple as that children, it s that simple as that because nationwide children and teens are struggling with a significantly hih struggling with a significantly high rates of depression. Anxiety, high rates of depression. Anxiety, suicidalthoughts, suicidal anxiety, suicidalthoughts, suicidal ideation and other mental suicidal ideation and other mental health issues largely because of social media. 30 because of social media. So what does because of social media. Sr what does tiktok say? a spokesperson for the massively popular video app told the bbc we strongly
CBI counsel Kuldeep Patil made this statement while opposing any blanket protection from arrest to the former zonal director of the Narcotics Control Bureau.
about that we just showed where fox and trump and everyone wants to build this person up as if they re an award-winning journalist when what you re arguing is they re associated with indicted individuals and foreign money, to some degree. and the hill has previously gotten caught publishing material that was secretly funded to the degree that mueller was investigating it as breaking foreign lobbying laws, where does it all land from here? we need to get to you know, unpack each of the dolls and john solomon, when we look at his work, we see giuliani with whom he had a business deal, was trying to develop one, and with whom he is working hand in glove. and giuliani sent his bogus articles to secretary of state mike pompeo. right. in order to fire u.s.
material, have you done anything illegal? judge napolitano: if you are in the business of publishing material you are not responsible for any criminal act committed by the person would gave them to you. stated differently, if they are given to a publisher, a journalist, and they are news worthy, they may be freely published. the supreme court ruled this in the pentagon papers case. he stole documents from the pentagon, gave them to the new york times and the government tried to prevent new york times from publishing and the supreme court said they are news worthy and new york times can publish. shepard: is there a gray area whether the wikileaks founder, julian assange, is a journalist? and whether that, or publisher, or does that not matter? jug the definite fission has the definition has probably changed since the pentagon