The project sponsor stated that there was a larger project next door. Variance are be precedent setting. The fact that there is a variance granted here does not immediately justify this variance, but for me, a couple factors here. The building, as we know is historic, which can generally, as you know, restrict or direct development on the lot. There is a pretty large front set back of about 10 feet. This is a much shorter lot than normal, about 75 feet deep. Just if seeing this project without context, my response was negative, that, you know, just encroaching all the way to the rear property line, but looking in the context here, and i think it is what in my mind is unprecedented as the Development Pattern on this block, and the number of buildings that are developed in this manner, including extensions that go to the rear property line, so that, to me, allows me to support a variance that they are seeking here. I think a code compliant alternative would probably be more harmful to th
Mental health respite programs perhaps looking this is an opportunity for overturning the imd exclusions as a long term goal. Lastly, at the state level, we might keep active ton safe injection issue, i guess that was a two year bill, that tha may come up in another year, so if that could be considered, those are my wishes, very excellent policies, i think you guys have always been ahead of the curve and as you know, as San Francisco goes, so goes the nation. Commissioner, was there something specific in either to have paragraphs or some area that you wanted to have consideration of asking for . No, these are justice ewes as i went through and looked, i didnt see them, they could be in there, if you feel theyre appropriate, i would add that as my suggestion, if you dont feel they meet our overall goals, ill also no, i think the federal policy on couldnt tra accepting is something we can add, the federal legislation on cannabis is something we could add, there is some language around co
You can also measure a complaint that had merit found in wrong doing that was stopped. Thats another way to measure it. And thats never reflected in the analysis of the material i have ever seen. I think it was, we dont want to put in first of all, theyre confidential. We dont want to put in anything that would restrict participation in or reporting of information but i have never understood so closed does not speak to the merits of the number of complaints received. Im wondering if theres a reason and i think there is, but if you could tell me again, i would appreciate it. You are correct. Because the complaint is closed doesnt mean it was substantiated. We evaluate the complaint, the investigation determines if theres a factual basis for the allegations and then if the allegations are true, if the alleged conduct would violate city criteria, policy and procedure or city code does that answer the first part . Substantiated or unsubstantiated are both inside the closed category. And in
Where you run into complications when you have a onetime trip or theres something over a border that doesnt service a consumer and i wonder how you resolve issues like that if it just crosses the border . Oh, yeah, good question, thank you. The Paratransit Program is required to provide service that complements the muni service and so the and thats under the a. D. A. Requirements and guidelines and so Paratransit Service goes generally threequarters of a mile around where muni goes, and the muni lines and the muni service and if a person that has a trip that is outside of that they can take their paratransit to wherever the end of the end of that border is, that service area, and then i would suggest they could continue on, but then theyd be responsible for paying for that portion of the trip. Yeah, i think that is an interesting point because it also eats up a lot of time and paratransit has a specific schedule theyre bound to by routes and those things dont always match up so thinkin
Mental health respite programs perhaps looking this is an opportunity for overturning the imd exclusions as a long term goal. Lastly, at the state level, we might keep active ton safe injection issue, i guess that was a two year bill, that tha may come up in another year, so if that could be considered, those are my wishes, very excellent policies, i think you guys have always been ahead of the curve and as you know, as San Francisco goes, so goes the nation. Commissioner, was there something specific in either to have paragraphs or some area that you wanted to have consideration of asking for . No, these are justice ewes as i went through and looked, i didnt see them, they could be in there, if you feel theyre appropriate, i would add that as my suggestion, if you dont feel they meet our overall goals, ill also no, i think the federal policy on couldnt tra accepting is something we can add, the federal legislation on cannabis is something we could add, there is some language around co