The Oregon Court of Appeals Wednesday issued a partial reversal of a state agency's ruling against two evangelical Christian bakers who declined to create a custom cake for a same-sex wedding on religious grounds.
The Center for Public Representation issued the following news:
The Center, together with a broad cross section of the disability, aging, and civil rights organizations, urged the
Commonwealth of Massachusetts to take specific steps to ensure individuals at high risk of complications from COVID-19 have equitable access to the vaccines.
These recommendation include: (1) the development and distribution of accessible, plain language resources in multiple formats; (2) broadening the list of qualifying co-morbid conditions, and creating pathways to vaccination for other individuals at higher risk of severe illness and death; (3) targeting outreach and vaccination resources to communities hard hit by the virus; and (4) ensuring accessible vaccination sites and procedures for securing vaccine appointments.
argument, but he doesn t think the state of colorado treated the baker very well when the human rights commission said he violated the state s public accommodation law. it s fascinating. his opinion in that texas case that decided on same-sex marriage for the nation was so eloquent to the point that i know of couples, gay and hetero, who use that as part of their wedding vows. it s such a beautifully written statement of belief. pete? his commission frequently used the word dignity, so that was the ruling in the gay marriage decision. so how does that play into this is a complicated question here. i must say, andrea, there are many nuances about this case that make it hard to figure out. on the one hand, what happened here is the couple walked into the bakery, and you re about to hear from the woman who was with them and can tell you more about that, but they never got down to