what they did was made all of those ancillary issues drop away which then allows you to get to the root, which is the prostitution. but were those things the prostitutes said made them safe? that s the argument. to take a silly example. if you wanted to out law riding a motorcycle which is a dangerous activity and you left it legal but out lawed helmets, then people would still ride motorcycles. if you make all of these if you force people to do illegally legal things dangerously, how are you served pub policy? if you look at the precedent that this could set, if parliament is going to go back and try and craft if they decide to do so if they want to go back and cast something, don t they have to keep in mind what the supreme court just said? what can you draw? always. it s about regulation.