Sitting president of the United States. Another mark up hearing tomorrow morning which is expected. The imminent impeachment on the house floor of President Trump. I want to bring in our correspondent, i believe we have garret headache aake on the hil his first appearance here on the hill. We have seen you a lot garret. We have some folks looking at that hearing, you have been looking at impeachment. Speaker pelosi has telegraphed a narrow case that could be pushed through judiciary, our colleague Geoff Bennett did not see the democrats splintering or holding other amendments here. They want to get this through you kn unified. What does your reporting show about that . Thats right. We have been starting to put the pieces together on a senate trial which is mostly fan
fiction of what you have been hearing about it that both sides speculated of what it looks like. We heard from Mitch Mcconnell yesterday afternoon saying theyll wait until the new year getting it started. It will push all
It gets to john mccain, john mccain puts it in his safe, gives it to me and i read it. In the first thing i thought was, oh, my god. This could be russian disinformation or they could have this on trump. If you read this information in the first thing you would think it is they got something on donald trump. Its stunning, its end at salacious and its a bunch of. Senator lindsey graham, chairman of the Senate Judiciary committee talking about the steele dossier, the focus of this Inspector Generals report and this hearing in washington. Your risk withere with chris wa. I think there is a lot of damaging information about the fisa warrants on the way was carried out, and it isnt just come up with this name of a
relatively low level fbi what lawyer, i just want to read you one statement in the Opening Statement. If we are deeply concerned of that basic and fundamental errors were made by three separate handpicked Investigative Teams on one of the most sensitive fbi investigations and that
intelligence purposes. it also would have been perfectly appropriate for a cross fire hurricane agent to have debriefed the fbi agent, and it was information potentially relevant to the investigation, was it not? and that briefing and those briefings are for the purposes of protecting campaigns and allowing transitions to occur. and it was an unusual circumstance. a participant in that briefing on the part of the trump campaign was the subject of the fbi investigation.
maybe i should not have been in that briefing. intelligence purposes. for intelligence purposes. and it also would have been appropriate for across fire hurricane agent to have debrief the fbi agent at the intelligence briefing to see if michael flynn have sent anything relevant to the investigation. it was information potentially relevant to the investigation, was it not? depending what occur there, you could foresee a hypothetical. it raises series of policy questions, the fbi director needs to sort through and understand leadership of the department. that briefing and those briefings are for purposes of protecting campaigns and to allow transitions to occur. it was an unusual circumstance. the subject of the fbi