Among those questions, what it could mean for 2020. Could some in the president s party be rethinking whether they want to stick with mr. Trump amid the impeachment fight. Well break down all the im kagss of last nights elections results. A significant new twist in the Impeachment Inquiry. Eu Ambassador Gordon Sondland changing his story now, backing up the testimony of several other key witnesses regarding aid to ukraine and the commitment to investigate the 2016 election and the bidens. But why was he allowed to change his testimony . Were going to dig into that in just a moment. Lets go right to the implications of tuesdays elections. For that i want to bring in msnbc National Political correspondent Steve Kornacki. Hes at the big board. Nbc news road war i dont Vaughn Hillyard joins us from louisville, kentucky. Vaughn, its a state that President Trump won by about 30 points in 2016. Here we are just three years later. Looks like there will be a Deck Kr Democrat in the governors me
more choppy back and forth hearings we ve gotten used to seeing. cynthia, the strategy so far for democrats has been, by and large, not to oversimplify it, but closed-door testimony, release of transcripts and public hearings. what do you make of the strategy so far, as a prosecutor, in terms of presenting the case to the public, swaying public opinion? you can tell that adam schiff and his staff are professional prosecutors. this is the way you would present a criminal case to a jury. you want to be very careful about who your first witness is, laying it out, gaining credibility. as the witness gains credibility with the jury, so does the prosecutor gain credibility with the jury. that first witness is really important. taylor is a very credible witness. it s a very smart choice. the cleanup witness at the end is also very important. if vindman isali at the end, th also makes sense. even if it takes it out of