that the word they used was a sing you lar response, a one-off response. then you twin that with what secretary mautdis said at the end, they do not have preemptive strike authority. it looks more and more like we had on april 6th. this response was a unique response and they are taking this on a case by case basis. one other quick note, in several moments they used the term measured response. you can continue to hear inside the pentagon, the launching that 59 strike targets, 57 of them were hit to get the maude maddow point. you get to this idea of proportion proportionality, we continue to hear that. if there are going to be additional chem cam attacks in syria, whether or not the sarin gas or chlorine, a couple of incidents in march they believe chlorine was used. that seems to trigger a chemical seems to counts a
it s one of the many difficults in covering a story like this and it often to be very blunt, leads to real problems particularly in a network that is all news and feels impaled to stay with the story, constantly even when you don t know anything which is another example of a loss of proportion proportionality. the worst moments in cnn s history has come when it felt itself to stay on the air of a story of clear importance but about which little or nothing is known, and so are you saying, jeff to be direct that cnn has gone overboard with this? i think there are i think this particular story, no actually because it unfolded in a relatively quick amount of time. i m thinking of stories like the washington navy yard story the boston marathon story, the malaysia 370 story where there is a drive to tell people something, we know people want
israel yesterday mistakenly reported that there will h been deaths in israel. none so far. some reports of light carpal tis, accurate? right. now, on the other side from the ministry of health there, close to 200 deaths, 1,400 injured, many women, children, civilians, schools supposedly damaged. it takes us to the issue of proportion proportionality. how does that play here? right, this is always the problem for israel. israel does send leaflets and phone people in order to get them to leave their building so as to order to try not to kill innocent civilians but gaza is a very heavily crowded place and when you launch all of these missiles, a very intense a raj by israel, more intense than in previous conflicts, you ll kill a lot of innocent people and that undermines israel on the world. on the other hand, israel has a very effective iron dome program and the hamas rockets are very inaccurate and primitive so every conflict like this, we ve
bob? look at times square! there are more cops in white neighborhoods here than in black neighborhoods, that means not surprising to me, white gets stopped and frisked more than blacks. bob, where are you getting that statistic. walking through times square. i love your science. perfect. beckel institute strikes again. find out how many cops are in black neighborhoods and how many in white neighborhoods. maybe talking by overwhelming numbers opposed to proportion proportionality. that may be right. eric, what happens when stop and frisk makes the neighborhoods safer. minority neighborhoods are safer. is it still bad because it is considered profiling? it is definitely considered profiling, as a lot of things are considered profiling, and has profiling has proven to be great crime deterrent. what are they catching and
bob? look at times square! there are more cops in white neighborhoods here than in black neighborhoods, that means not surprising to me, white gets stopped and frisked more than blacks. bob, where are you getting that statistic. walking through times square. i love your science. perfect. beckel institute strikes again. find out how many cops are in black neighborhoods and how many in white neighborhoods. maybe talking by overwhelming numbers opposed to proportion proportionality. that may be right. eric, what happens when stop and frisk makes the neighborhoods safer. minority neighborhoods are safer. is it still bad because it is considered profiling? it is definitely considered profiling, as a lot of things are considered profiling, and has profiling has proven to be great crime deterrent. what are they catching and